Category Features

Point #68: Best Multiple Booth Display – Tawapa

phoebe headshotPhoebe Minona

I am being given the opportunity to write about my company, Tawapa, for this issue of The Point, as we won the award for “Best Multiple Booth Display” at this year’s Conference. I’m honored of course, but given the audience, a promotional article on who we are feels redundant. We’ve been around awhile and, if you have too, you’ve probably already read it somewhere before. This realization allowed me to reflect on all the years we have been in this industry and how it has changed over time. A more appropriate title for this article could be “Growing up as a business in an unstable environment” or,” A condensed history of organic jewelry through the eyes of Tawapa.”

Being in our teens (as a company) feels the same as getting older as a human. We have become wiser and more mature, but we are left wondering how so much time could have passed. As we continue to accumulate years of experience, I realize that the lifespan of this company reflects the ebb and flow of life itself, a road paved with joy and successes, but not without bumps, potholes, and major road blocks.

I began Tawapa as a renegade wanderer, rejecting the confines of normalcy for a life of adventure, art, and eccentric exchanges with extraordinary people. This put me on a direct trajectory into the piercing world, which embodied and supported all of these ideals. In 1996, I found myself in a small carving village in Indonesia. In those days, the carvers in that village were actually carving sculptures, animals, and art, but as years passed the village has become dominated by piercing jewelry—to the point of oversaturation. When I first arrived there, I was introduced to an exceptional carver who opened the doors of creativity to me. I was so inspired, the possibilities felt limitless. I came back to America with a little suitcase full of treasures I had collected and created. I traveled the country in an old truck with my little case and my carver friend at a time when almost no one had even encountered “organic” jewelry. In fact, that term was only just then being coined. If I am correct, it was Erica Skatsen who coined it. I met her in Portland that summer. She was hand-carving beautiful wood plugs.  She was a pioneer in her field and our meeting felt important and exciting.  Besides Erika, Borneo Joe had created and produced incredible jewelry, but his wares were not widely distributed. In Europe, Cold Steel and Wild Cat had begun carrying some carved horn and bone jewelry, but that was it. The tiniest handful of artists, designers, and distributors were the beginning of a new movement of jewelry in the piercing world which, until that time, had been dominated by steel jewelry.

Tawapa booth winners
Photo by Autumn Swisher

As we all know, the term “organic jewelry” quickly became industry jargon.  An influx of carved jewelry, particularly horn and bone, flooded the market. Everyone and their piercer decided to go to Bali, the mecca of the organic movement, to cash in on a budding micro industry that seemed to be growing and growing. Meanwhile, the peaceful village of artisans took down their signs that said “handicrafts” and hung new ones stating “piercing jewelry”. An artist village became a piercing village. The younger locals even began adopting the style, stretching their ears, covering themselves in tattoos, and listening to punk rock heavy metal.

This shift in the industry was both exciting and overwhelming. I loved the hardcore aesthetic some of the Balinese were embodying at the same time that more and more people in America and Europe were stretching their ears and choosing organic jewelry.  I did not love the disproportionate amount of jewelry companies that were popping up everyday, and with them, an excessive amount of rip offs and counterfeits. However, now that we are in our ripe old teenage years, I can look back at that time with gratitude and appreciate the fruits that blossomed from that rich yet unstable environment.

Within a couple years, we saw many companies fall as quickly as they had risen. Most of them realized that there was a lot more to running an international business than they had imagined, and the dream was quickly deflated. The ones that did manage to hold on and grow within the industry did so because they were exceptional. With so much competition, the only way to make it was to be amazing. Today there are only a few really successful companies in the “organic jewelry” industry.  The ones who have succeeded are the ones who have forged their own unique aesthetic and style, who make beautiful high quality jewelry, and who know how to run and manage a business.

I feel honored to have been able to experience so much growth and change and sometimes challenge in this dynamic, insular, tiny beast of a community. I am grateful to the companies who came before me for paving the road.  I also appreciate all of those companies who came and went over the years.  I see now that they helped shape who we are (and who we are not), and demanded that we up our game. Most of all, as I reflect on the history of Tawapa, I thank our loyal customers who have supported us all these years and I thank my colleagues, the ones who have carved their own niche in this industry, through beautiful jewelry and a sense of integrity.  They have challenged me to continue to excel. Because of them, I have not had the luxury of being lazy. I have learned humility in the most honorable way.  I am constantly inspired and motivated to create and to continue to evolve Tawapa on all levels.

This year has brought a lot of change for us as a company, with a move to Los Angeles, a new look, new logo, and more jewelry than ever before.  In this industry, as in life, change is the only constant. Embracing change is the gift that comes with age.  We, at Tawapa, feel that we are at the dawning of another new era in jewelry, and in life, and we cannot wait to share it with you.

Point #68: Dual Innovator Award-Winner – Jimmy Buddha and Diablo Organics

Jimmy Buddha headshotJimmy Buddha

To win both innovator’s awards this APP was both a wonderful surprise and an honor. In an industry where so much is changing and evolving, it feels good to know we might be doing something right. I have never really been good at following the rules; pushing limits has always been my natural reaction to the world around me. But if it wasn’t for my team at Diablo Organics and my peer group, I would not have the freedom, support, and inspiration to produce award-winning jewelry.

Only a handful of years ago, many of the designs and concepts I utilize today would not have been well received. I have learned the hard way that the key to creating successful designs is not just innovation, but timing and perseverance. It is a testament to our industry and diversified clientele that we are capable of creating new concepts, and utilizing old (and even ancient) ideas to move out of niche markets on the fringe of society, and into the larger fashion industry as a whole. This is helping our businesses to flourish and provide professional services to the general public. So, to those of us “old timers,” I hope we can embrace the evolution of our industry, and bring positive influence and wisdom to help guide our paths. To the “fresh blood,” I enjoy the new perspectives and energy you bring to the table, challenging us to stay relevant in this ultra-fast-paced world.

Diablo_jewelry
Photo courtesy of Diablo Organics

We entered and won with the saddle spreader hooks in the Technical Innovation category. It’s a variation on our original spreader hook. I designed it to accommodate our ever-growing line of “dangles.”  It is a simple and basic concept all piercers use whether they’re conscious of it or not. Spreading pressure over a wider surface area creates a more comfortable and wearable piece of jewelry. This design allows people of all different sizes to rock progressively heavier “dangles”. It also allows me, as a designer, to create pieces that would otherwise be too heavy to wear.

For the Creative Innovator Award, I used a design I’ve had on the books for a few years but have never had the right materials to make happen. Then I came across an amazing section of “grade A” fossilized mammoth tusk allowing us to make these beautiful, three-inch swastikas a reality. The swastika is a hot topic in the Western world, especially in the cyber reality that currently exists, causing much debate. Mention it to people in Asia and they will shrug their shoulders and ask, “What’s the big deal?” It’s a symbol they see daily. I am aware of the negative connotations this image carries for many, the positive ones for others, the recent historical context, the ancient context, and even all the misinformation out there on the “interwebs,” the list goes on and on.

jimmy buddhaWhy does Diablo Organics use it? Why do I use it in my jewelry and even in my logo? For me it is about freedom. It’s freedom from dogma, preconceived ideas, rules, opinions, religion, hate or whatever box “they” try to put me in. I’m here to smash the limits and keep kicking ass. That being said: a big THANK YOU to all of you who support us. Through your support we will continue to do what we do and bring you unique, quality jewelry made from extraordinary materials.

 

Point #68: President’s Award

Elayne Angel_high resElayne Angel

Giving out the President’s Award was one of the duties I most looked forward to when I first came into office as President, and it is one of the things I will miss now that my three-year term of service is complete. It is an honor to be able to select worthy individuals from our community and recognize them for their dedication and contributions.

The person receiving this year’s award has spent over 20 years in the industry and could definitely be considered a pioneer. They started a piercing business back in 1992 and have been a Business Member of the Association of Professional Piercers since 1996.

This individual has been involved since the first APP Conference and was actually a co-organizer of that original event.

The recipient of the 2014 award has also served on the Board of Directors more than once, and has further distinguished himself doing projects for various committees.

Additionally, he has worked with a number of government agencies including NEHA, the CDC, and NIOSH, to promote safe piercing.

This gentleman  is also known as an educator and has taught at APP Conferences and other seminars abroad, including events in Italy, Sweden, and Germany.

He is also a husband and a father.

It is no secret that we have differing approaches to certain things, but there is clearly a mutual professional respect between us, which is something I’m so happy to see throughout the industry in general: the understanding that there is more than one way to achieve desired results.

This man is an incredibly hard-working volunteer who has devoted countless hours to numerous projects to further the goals and mission of the organization. He has accomplished a tremendous and impressive amount of work throughout his involvement with the organization and especially during the past three years.

I do have to clarify at this point that a Statim [the type of autoclave he represents and sells] is NOT required for APP membership. The recipient of this year’s President’s Award is Brian Skellie! Great job, Brian; congratulations!

Elayne gives Brian the President's Award, with the help of some streakers. Photo by Autumn Swisher.
Elayne gives Brian the President’s Award, with the help of some streakers. Photo by Autumn Swisher.

Point #68: Josh A. Prentice Award Winner – Ryan Ouellette

Caitlin McDiarmid headshotCaitlin McDiarmid

While at Conference this year,  Bethra Szumski came and found me. She had spoken with Josh’s mom that day. During the course of relaying the story to me, she was overcome with emotion.  She told me that Josh’s mom is so very grateful that we are keeping Josh’s memory alive with this award.

At Conference I asked everyone: those who knew Josh and miss him and those who didn’t know Josh, but should have—raise a glass, whether water or wine—and toast Josh, a very fine young man who left this place too early, and leaves us both richer and poorer with his departure.

The recipient of this year’s Josh A. Prentice Award is Ryan Ouellette.

Ryan is a good friend of mine.  Somewhere in my head I worried about giving him this award.  He’s more than deserving, but sometimes our community can’t see that service—and what it means to volunteer can be extremely diverse.

Ryan isn’t a traditional boots-on-the ground volunteer or an in-the-trenches volunteer.

He has, however, contributed hours and hours of work and some of the major ideas that have shaped our Conference into what it is today.

Back on December 5, 2008 I received an email from Ryan, whom I didn’t know well. He wrote that some of our most trusted Board Members had been impressed with his teaching at BMX and that they suggested he reach out and possibly teach at the APP Conference.  He wrote. “maybe I sucked, and they just felt bad.” He was a bit self-deprecating, and didn’t seem to think that we would be interested.

By February of 2009, a mere two months later, he had submitted two fully fleshed-out proposals to the Conference Committee: one was for a workshop-based class that changed up the lecture format (that all classes were being taught in at that time) and one was for the Mentor Program.

In 2009 he wasn’t an APP member and therefore wasn’t asked to take on the lead role in either of the programs. However, due to certain circumstances, he wound up taking the lead on the Mentor Program that year and playing a key role teaching some of the workshop sessions. By the following year, while he still wasn’t a member, he was lead instructor on the workshop session(s) as was Jesse Villemaire. (At that time, the APP allowed non-members to teach only if they were “experts” on a topic and they were more qualified to teach the class than an available member.)

Ryan has consistently provided ideas and thoughts on ways to improve Conference since he got involved in 2008. These two programs alone have reshaped our Conference, infused new excitement into classes, and were instrumental, I believe, in changing how our seasoned attendees treat and perceive new attendees.

How else has he volunteered? For the past three years he has participated in processing, interviewing, and choosing the Al D. scholars—which, this year, also included 26 phone interviews.

He has worked countless hours as part of the APP team for Tumblr. (The estimation of hours is  seven to ten hours per a week; that’s somewhere between 726 hours and 1040 hours over the last two years.) And we know these social media efforts have been key to the growth that our membership and our Conference has experienced recently.

He is always available for me—offering to help in any way throughout the year—and I hand him small projects where I can.

He is also the first person at Conference who took great pains to arrange for me to leave the hotel a few years back and go out to dinner with him and his friends. While it seems like a simple thing, for me this was a monumental task. By doing this, however, it became clear to me that if I put my trust in my volunteer team that everything would be ok, whether I was there or not.

Instructor, mentor, inspiration, social media mogul, and finally an APP member, Ryan became a member in 2011. I had many conversations with him before he became a member—about the Association and membership. Through his experience and service with the Association, Ryan changed his views of the APP and become one of our staunchest advocates.

Ryan is a special kind of leader. He is special kind of volunteer.

He’s provided emotional support and friendship for years, especially during Conference crunch time. I am so glad to have him as my friend, and it was a joy to present this award to him.

Ryan Ouellette

Point #67: Cultural Appropriation

Kendra JaneAlicia CardenasBy Kendra Jane and Alicia Cardenas

Thanks to technology, innovations and information find their way around the world instantaneously via the Internet. Access to this knowledge has allowed worldwide connections to be made and open dialogues to be held on a vast array of topics, pertinent to our industry and not. One such topic has recently been brought to the forefront in our industry: cultural appropriation. A recent Tumblr post, “Cultural Appropriation and Body Modification,” has gotten a lot of people talking. (For those of you unfamiliar with the idea of cultural appropriation and white privilege read on for some background information, albeit very basic and simplified.) Talking is good, no matter where you stand or what your opinion—and after reading the original piece most piercers have an opinion. What we would like to propose is an open and ongoing dialogue on this subject, and to start this dialogue we offer one opinion, that of Sol Tribes’ Alicia Cardenas. We invite our readership to offer their insights and opinions for future issues. (Submit here!)

Understanding White Privilege

White privilege refers to the set of societal privileges that white people benefit from beyond those commonly experienced by people of color in the same social, political, or economic spaces (nation, community, workplace, income, etc.). It is used to explain the advantages that white individuals experience, and also implies the right to assume the universality of one’s own experiences, marking others as different or exceptional while perceiving oneself as normal.

White privilege functions differently in different places, and a person’s white skin will not be an asset to them in every conceivable place or situation (though it is assumed to be an asset in most of the Western world). White people are a global minority, and this fact affects the experiences they have outside of their homes. Nevertheless, some people who use the term “white privilege” describe it as a worldwide phenomenon, resulting from the history of colonialism by white Europeans. (One author goes so far as to argue that American white men are privileged almost everywhere in the world, even though many countries have never been colonized by Europeans.)

One example of white privilege that can be found in the body modification community is when white Westerners obtain extensive black and grey tattoos “borrowed” heavily from the iconography of non-Western cultures. What does it mean for a middle-class white woman to appropriate the symbols of ancient Tibetan monks? Does the self-empowerment that body modification provides come at the cost of indigenous cultural forms?

Pitts (2003) advocates for body politics informed by history and critical of power. She sees the rise of tattooing and body modification amongst white Westerners as “identity tourism,” where cyberpunks, neo-tribalists, Goths, and others appropriate the cultural practices and corporeal rituals of non-Western others (Pitts 2003). Although these individuals may be well intentioned in their desire to frame “traitorous identities” in solidarity with non-western cultures, they nonetheless reify the very modern-primitive divide they seek to displace. Rather than an act of subversion, the tattooed body (and other modifications like stretched lobes, scarifications, brandings, etc.) represent the privilege of white Westerners to name and claim the cultural other as their own.

So, while those in the body modification industry debate what I consider a pretty cut-and-dry case of white privilege (whether or not white dudes should be walking around wearing swastikas) can we now open the dialogue* on cultural appropriation in the body modification industry/subculture?

Cultural Appropriation in the Body Modification Industry: A Response by Alicia  Cardenas

Editor’s Note: You will find the complete and unedited response here.

I appreciate you [Alan]  initiating a conversation like this…it is also my hope that you read this with an open mind and heart….

I am speaking to you from the perspective of a woman, a native to north and Central America, a body piercer and essentially a “hipster white kid” believer.

Although I appreciate what you think is an attempt to magnify the “injustices” taking place in the body modification industry or rather “disrespect to indigenous people of the planet ” you have, in fact, done quite the opposite. In my opinion you have done more damage than good in the quest for higher conscientiousness and unity.

In this melting pot of a culture you live in, you have put your perspective or opinion in a place above others in an attempt to right some wrongs that you believe are occurring. Don’t you think it’s time that privileged people stop telling all the other people what to do? Isn’t that the premise of all colonization on this planet…[s]omeone with presumed privilege telling the crazy natives to act and behave in a certain way? Let me tell you something…really something about what it’s like to not belong anywhere and find a connection with anything that keeps you feeling like a human…[b]ecause that’s what tattoos, stretched lobes, body modifications, jewelry, ritual, and other earthly things do for some people…and most certainly for me.

If you want to know how a native person feels about using ancient symbols or ceremonies in a modern way for tattoos or otherwise maybe you should ask one. Instead of instituting what you think upon the situation, just pick up a stone and throw it, you will no doubt hit a person who is native to some place who uses these symbols and ceremonies. White, black, red, yellow…all the people of the earth. What you find is a person who lives connected to these symbols and is happy to share, even with the most oblivious. Symbols don’t belong to anyone–that’s what make them symbols…they can symbolize anything you want them to….

The Cutting Scene, Mandan-O-kee-pa Ceremony, 1832. Painting by George Catlin.
The Cutting Scene, Mandan-O-kee-pa Ceremony,
1832. Painting by George Catlin.

Lets talk details:



“Using culturally significant names for westernized piercings” How presumpt[ous] and white privileged of you to call these piercings western, or to identify them with modern usage before their cultural roots. A sadhu piercing is called a sadhu piercing because the first people to have large conch piercings where in fact sadhus so that means we stole it not the other way around…

“Wearing culturally significant jewelry with no regard to the culture it came from.” Wearing jewelry from another culture, without knowing the significance, are you kidding me? If you studied [the] jewelry of the world and tribal cultures you would know that one thing all the cultures of the world have in common is that many times, if not most times, jewelry is worn for adornment…to look beautiful and to express a beautification process.

“Stealing culturally significant tattoo imagery, jewelry designs, etc. ” Stealing really? Stealing is a word that doesn’t belong in this equation…to steal something means it at some point belonged to someone and was then stolen.  Symbols like the swastika don’t belong to anyone or any one culture, just like the cross…or spiral, or hundreds of other imagery items that are now used for tattoos…if they don’t belong to anyone , you cannot steal them…in fact I would go so far as to say they belong to everyone.

“Stealing the names of rituals, mimicking them, and/or taking elements from and using them outside of their cultural history. (“Kavadi” and “Sundance” rituals.)” Stealing the names of rituals? Really? Mimicking them? Taking elements? Blood rituals go back as far as humanity…they don’t have names until we gave them names and therefor[e] stealing their names is a moot point. Spiritual ceremonies belong to the people who participate in them. The ceremonies from Africa using scarification aren’t stolen from Meso Americans that also practice the same art. And mimicking? The modern day Sundance ritual is a mimick of itself at best as the ceremony has changed many times…[t[he Druids have a type of Sundance, the Lakota, the Mexicah, Mayas, Dine…about a million visions of the same intention who is to say a backyard suspension hold any less importance. These rituals are resurfacing in different manifestations all over the world, none more important than the other. Should people be respectful of ceremony in general? Absolutely. Should they feel like they don’t belong doing those ceremonies because they are white or not able to make it to the land of their origin to participate in the original mimic of their roots? Absolutely not. Any truly spiritual person will honor each individual and the movement that is needed to accomplish their spiritual quest….add these words to the list of names that don’t belong to any one tribe therefore are not needing you to defend their usage. Vision quest, Sweatlodge, Moondance, Ball dance, Spear dance, Blessing Way, Birthrites, Death dance, etc…. These ceremonies belong to the people of this earth, they are not a privilege but a birthright, at anytime any human or any cultural background can claim these rights and don’t deserve to have anyone judge them for that.

“Wearing cultural people as tattoos or on clothing, often a bastardized and racist stereotype of the culture. (“Indian girl” tattoos with headdresses and face paint, “Gypsy” tattoos, etc.)” Regardless of what you might think both the examples given here are part of a subculture here in the United States that wears these Tattoos not for the content but because of the original artist who made them popular. Both the Indian head and gypsy head tattoos come from a body of work originated by artists like Sailor Jerry who serve as a godfather of modern tattooing in North America. People get them more for the traditional style than for the content, so while trying to amplify the offensive nature you are also trying to rip apart a culturally significant design to THIS culture.

“Wearing other cultures’ clothing as costumes for events” 
This might be the only one I agree with you on but I also feel like this has been taken too far. Black face is not funny, no doubt…but does a person dressed as a Mexican Vato for Halloween offend me? No not really…and men dressed in drag for Halloween also doesn’t offend me. What offends me is how offended everyone gets for no reason.

I realize your original  post was to heighten awareness of these subjects but what it sounds like you are saying is “you should stick with your tribe and not borrow from others” or “don’t do it unless it’s from your cultural background” and what that says to me is you are more comfortable keeping cultures segregated. Expressing disgust or dislike to “white hipster” kids for learning about cultural symbols and tattooing them is so ironic since you are in fact a “white hipster” but alas refer to my initial statement that says I am a “white hipster” believer…what I mean by that is the middle American white male that has “stolen” these cultural markings has in fact given birth to the generation of piercers that I identify with. If it wasn’t for a certain few white males in western culture (Fakir, Blake, Cliff Cadaver, etc)  “reclaiming” these practices and then being published in magazines and books (Modern Primitive, Savage Magazine, PFIQ etc.) I would have never found modification and connected in the way I have to my culture and the rich cultures of the world that have been my inspiration for the last 20 years in the industry.  I believe in the movement of young westerners and their innocent quest to connect with the culture of the world. I believe it has been monumental in the resurfacing of ancient practices that in so many ways are saving lives, mending broken hearts and closing in the boundaries that separate us.

“Those of us with privileges should be using that to elevate the voices of others in our community and reaching out to those who may feel initially left out rather than asserting opinions and alienating them.” In your attempt to not alienate people you have done so. Take your own advice. In my fight to connect with other humans, to belong to the tribes of the world and to educate about compassion and awareness…I encourage you to step back, look at what has been said and realize that you are most certainly part of the problem in our industry, not the kid who unknowingly is wearing some jewelry from India , but a person who judges and presumes to know what is best for others based off [of] limited knowledge of the subject. If you would like I would love to have this conversation in person and invite others to chime in.

Since Alicia’s initial response she has also added the following afterword. We hope that, as you read this and form your own opinions on the subject, our industry can only benefit and grow from open discussion on topics that can affect all of us.

AFTERWORD (from Alicia)

We live in a culture…where suicide is the third leading cause of death in young people between 15-25, where depression is the #1 disability in the world, where 160,000 children miss school everyday because of fear of attack or intimidation. Being different and adhering to your own set of rules is not celebrated but condemned and even physically dangerous. And if that isn’t hard enough to endure we then turn our anger on ourselves. There are many things that frustrate me about our culture here in the States. What comes to mind now is the way in which we are so hard on ourselves almost to the point of self-loathing…[w]e hate how fat we are, how skinny we are, that we are too white, black or brown…we grew up with too much privilege or not enough but either way we carry these things with us everywhere and it results in making us feel more isolated instead of less. When I wrote the response to Alan’s post it was to bring a level of awareness to some of the harshness we have for ourselves and highlight the idea that maybe our approach to these subjects is flawed, that we are looking at things through eyes that have been programed poorly. That maybe the way things had been taught to us, never acknowledged us for who we are in our hearts and only acknowledged us for who we are based off ancestral background.

Do I believe that we all need to be aware and compassionate to other cultures and their way of life? Yes of course. Do I believe that being respectful and willing to educate is a part of our obligations? Absolutely. But do I believe we should apologize for “borrowing” elements from other cultures in a quest to find our own voice or path: No I do not.  In my response I said a few things that really sum up my feelings about it all.  Maybe people will say I am idealistic and have too broad a view, or maybe even to[o] inclusive, but the time has come within our community to recognize what brings us together rather than what sets us apart. We all aspire to connect, be it with people, symbols or ideas. At this point, if anyone connects with anything IN or outside of their own ancestry they should be celebrated and respected because without those connections they certainly could become a statistic or get lost in the abyss of self hate.

It always occurs to me after the fact that I should learn to be more loving in my communication, but for some reason this particular subject brings out a certain frustration in me. Maybe it’s the years and years of abuse from this culture, telling me what and who I should be, or maybe it’s th[e] fact that I didn’t feel like I belonged anywhere for most of my life and certainly didn’t realize I belonged to a historically relevant subculture. I am very protective and defensive of the people in my community and I see the importance in the work we have done in the last 20 years. Some may think it means nothing but to me it means everything. A lot has changed in 20 years: transgender was not even in our vocabulary, facial tattoos were not socially acceptable, “piercing” or “piercing studios” were basically not legitimate forms of work. Now, because of all of you and the fight that you have fought to be different, to wear your symbols and to be the best version of yourself, you have paved the way for the youngsters who will be on the same quest now as they are coming of age.

Point #66: Piercer Fights for Freedom of Creative Expression

Victoria-VooDoo-headshotBy Victoria Voodoo

Editor’s Note: This article is reprinted from Obscure Magazine (September 2013).

Recently, while scrolling through Facebook, I crashed head-first into an article titled “Bill to Ban Certain Tattoos, Body Piercings Passes Senate.”  Glaring back at me was a close-up of a girl covered in tattoos, piercings, and neon colored hair with the words “BANNED” stamped across the image. NO WAY, I thought.  There is no way, in this day and age, that any U.S. state could outlaw tattoos…

…right?

I was hooked.  I clicked the link.

I was not surprised to find an article barking about how an Arkansas Senator is on a mission to limit the freedom of creative expression in her state.  The majority of the reviews of this particular article were of similar tone:  Anger, frustration, fear, offense.  Certainly our freedom to be tattooed, pierced, scarred, and branded is protected under freedom of speech.  Is Big Brother watching us?

Seeing this uproar intrigued me.  I had to know more.  Without much difficulty, I found the actual senate bill in question:  “Senate Bill 387.  Arkansas Senate Bill.  To Limit Body Art Procedures.”  This bill has been sponsored by Arkansas Republican Senator, Missy Irvin.

I read it all the way through.  In its first draft, the language was rather vague.  It was not necessarily banning or outlawing anything, but the spectrum of what was being considered a “piercing” or a “piercer” (among other definitions) was very broad.  Technically, under the original language, even naval piercings would have been made illegal if the bill was passed into law.  However, there were modifications made to that vague, original language.  I wanted to know who was responsible for those modifications.

My investigation continued.  I emailed the sponsoring Senator, personally, and began my hunt for whoever may have helped modify the language of the original bill.  I found Misty Forsberg, a piercer and scarification specialist from Southtown Tattoo & Body Piercing in Fort Smith, Arkansas (the irony is not lost on me that the modifier to the bill’s language is a body modification artist).  Irvin and Forsberg responded to me and they were both extremely open and helpful in teaching me about what happened, how it started, how it ended, and everything in between.

The battle lasted about a year.  There were significant technicalities to clarify.  Both sides had to absorb vast amounts of education to be able to cohesively speak about this piece of legislature.

In an interview, Forsberg told me “essentially, the state took an interest in heavy modification and held a meeting in which [owner-operator of Anchor Tattoo and Piercing Studio in North Bryant, Arkansas] Dustin Jackson, [Association of Professional Piercers Representative] Steve Joyner, and I were asked about the modifications [the state] had heard of or found online. We did our best to educate them on the areas they asked about, and encourage them to work with our community rather than trying to write legislation for us with little to no knowledge of the subject.” ¹

With the support of the ABMA (Arkansas Body Modification Association), the APTPI (Associazione Piercers e Tatuatori Professionisti Italiani), letter writing from the community, international support, and varying levels of outrage being poured out on social media networks, the body modification artists were able to appeal to the Senator and the state government to clarify the language.

The vague language in the first draft of the bill was revised.  For any current or potential body modification clients, 2the most important thing to know about the final draft of the bill is:  NOTHING WAS MADE ILLEGAL.  “The final result was the bill that passed, SB387, defined scarification as a form of body art, but still banned subdermal implants from being performed by licensed Arkansas body artists, with no criminal penalty listed.”¹  To clarify, this means if you want a subdermal implant and you live in Arkansas, you now have to go to a licensed medical professional instead of a piercer or a tattoo artist.

The bill defining scarification as a form of body art changes nothing about its legality.  All it means is: scarification is now recognized as a “real” art form – similar to the military recognizing Paganism as a “real” religion to print on government-issued dog tags.  To me, this is a positive change.  More openly-recognized diversity in the body modification industry will help avoid situations like this in the future (for example:  naval piercings being lumped into the same category as subdermal implants).

While the limitations to who can perform subdermal implants can be considered rather disheartening, in the long run, it is not a significant loss to the industry.  “There have been several people upset to see any ban, and I agree that it isn’t entirely what we would have liked to see.  One day it may reach a point when [subdermal implants] become a licensed practice, but that day isn’t today.  For now, I feel the compromise we reached isn’t a step backward for that industry.”¹  Think about how bad the results of this battle could have been.  We live to fight another day.

Something else worth considering is the differences between the artists and the government involved.  Both parties worked together to find a mutually agreed-upon middle ground that made everybody as happy as possible.  In an email correspondence, Senator Irvin told me “Not everything you read on the Internet is truth. I completely reject the idea that I somehow am limiting freedom of expression when the tattoo artists of my state wrote this bill along with me, the Arkansas Department of Health and other legislators from both sides of the aisle.”²  Through hard work, discipline, open communication, and mutual education, these stereotypically different parties were able to find compromise.

Anybody who is tattooed, pierced, or modified has likely experienced some sort of discrimination – myself included.  Very often, being modified gives “conservative” people the impression that we are less educated or of questionable morals.  We must, however, realize that the conservatives also face a similar type of discrimination from us, the modified.  I will bet when you read “Republican Senator,” you automatically assumed that Missy Irvin would be cold-hearted, close-minded, and unmoving on her stance to ban certain types of body modification.  I will be the first to admit that I was afraid that would be true, too, but she then told me “I am proud of our work and was honored to work with a very fine group of professionals with a high code of ethics.  I have a tremendous amount of respect for them and their passion for their art, industry and clients.”²

Admit it.  That is awesome.

3The professional respect did not stop there.  Misty Forsberg expressed to me “the misinformation which has been posted online does not help our fight here, and, if anything, sets us back with that progress. More importantly, we hope that people realize the rude and disrespectful comments made toward Missy Irvin that are being encouraged do nothing but make us look like the unprofessional, unintelligent people that many state representatives might assume we are. She and our industry might not see eye to eye, but in the end she chose to work with us rather than push forward with a bill that could have potentially harmed our industry a great deal.  She shook our hands when we won, and she admitted that her view of who we are was different than when she first came into this. We could all do with being polite enough to show the same level of professional courtesy.”¹

If you learn nothing else from this article, learn that.

What scares me most, at this point, is that just because something is illegal does not mean people will stop.  If somebody wants a subdermal implant in Arkansas but does not want to pay for a “licensed medical professional” (basically a plastic surgeon), he or she might find an underground artist to perform the procedure behind closed doors, against regulations.  This poses just as much risk as getting a tattoo out of some dude’s garage.  You, the client, will be at a higher risk of exposure to infection, blood-borne diseases, and rejection of the piercing, implant, or tattoo that you might get.

Always do your research.  Always be smart.  Always go to a professional.  In my humble opinion, follow the old adage of “good tattoos ain’t cheap, and cheap tattoos ain’t good.”  It is so true in so many different contexts.  Do not sacrifice your health, your appearance, your pride, or even your wallet for something that only seems easier or cheaper.

I know reading about politics can be about as thrilling as a root canal, but it is important for all of us to stay abreast of any changes to the industry.  The best way to gain acceptance for our respective forms of creative expression is to keep ourselves educated, informed, and professional.  Just because this particular incident happened in Arkansas does not mean it cannot or will not happen in your state at some point.  In an article published by the A.P.P., Forsberg stated “oddly, the most valuable lesson I learned from this was not about legislative writing, legalities, or how to create change in my state.  It was about support – the importance of all of us supporting each other as an industry.”³

Senate Bill 387 was passed into law earlier this year.

Senator Missy Irvin and Scarification Specialist Misty Forsberg with a group of artists who helped work on SB387.  Photo credit:  Joe Phillips.  Permission to print given by Misty Forsberg.

¹ Interview with Misty Forsberg via Facebook Messenger – 08/26/2013.

² Email correspondence with Senator Missy Irvin – 08/21/2013.

³ Misty Forsberg.  “Point # 63 – Arkansas Legislation.”  The Point – The Quarterly Journal of the Association of Professional Piercers.  05/04/2013.

 

Point #65: The Latin-American Body Piercing Association (LBP)

LBP LogoBy the Latin American Body Piercing Association

Editor’s note: The history and growth of the APP’s outreach work in Mexico has been included in The Point many times before. Alicia Cardenas’ initial outreach in December of 2003, when she was the APP’s International Liaison, was reported in The Point #28. The APP seminars in Mexico were reported on in 2006 (#35), 2007 (#42), 2008 (#45), 2009 (#50), and 2010 (#54), and Danny Yerna organized the last seminars sponsored by the APP in 2012. This year marks the first year that the seminars were put on independently of the APP, by the newly-formed Latin American Body Piercing Association.

The history and mission of the LBP

The Latin-American Body Piercing Association (LBP) is a recently-formed non-profit association based in Mexico.

The decision to create the LBP was made by the attendees of the APP’s 2012 educational seminars LBP_boardin Mexico, when a meeting was held where the majority voted in favor of creating this association, and also voted on who should be on the first board of directors.

The board of the LBP is comprised of seven body piercers from Mexico. Many have been piercing for ten or fifteen years; most are shop owners in Mexico and all are well known by the piercing community.

The LBP’s board of directors and founding members are:

  • Danny Yerna, President (Wakantanka)
  • Ana Paula Escalante, Secretary (Tonatiuh and Quetzalli)
  • Axayacatl Nochipa, Treasurer (Studio 184)
  • Charly Pastrana (Tercer Ojo Krew)
  • Karlin Murillo (Nomadas)
  • Memo Reyes (Tercer Ojo Krew)
  • Mario Oliva (Busterzone)

Later, Mauricio Torres (Extigma and BioMetal) was added as head of South American Outreach.

LBP_group shotThe mission (and vision) of the LBP is to educate and inform piercers and the public about the techniques, materials, safety, and health practices related to body piercing, to raise the standards, while respecting our differences. At the same time to help the Latin American community build stronger bonds in a respectful and relaxed environment, and to be a link between Spanish-speaking piercers with what is happening in the world.

What has been accomplished so far in Mexico

In 2001, there was a meeting with legislators in Mexico City. Two of our current LBP board members (Danny and Ana Paula) attended and spoke about what we were doing and what laws were needed. Four tattoo artists, two doctors and two legislators also attended.  This was a historic event for the body piercing industry in the country. After this meeting, the first draft was made of a law covering tattoos, cosmetic tattoos, and body piercings.

In 2005, the first body art law in Mexico became official: no tattooing or piercing of minors!

In 2006, the APP’s first educational seminars were held in Mexico City, attended by many piercers from all through Mexico,  APP Members from the U.S., and several Mexican public health officials.

Since this time, we have been collaborating with health officials and giving suggestions on the laws, LBP_jewelrywhich were being drafted based on APP guidelines. Our suggestions were approved (but unfortunately not all were applied appropriately), but by 2012 we finally had a law on piercing and tattooing (and cosmetic tattooing).

The law states that body art practitioners must:

  • Have proof of first aid training
  • Have a procedure manual
  • Be vaccinated for tetanus and hepatitis B
  • Use approved release forms
  • Distribute basic aftercare sheets to clients
  • Use new, sterile, and disposable needles and not a piercing gun
  • Use quality jewelry and/or ink
  • Refrain from using anesthetics
  • Use gloves
  • Use mouth covers
  • Use an autoclave or other sterilizers
  • Use equipment that ensures aseptic techniques and a safe level of hygiene
  • Have access to running water
  • Have a separate room for procedures
  • Use a separate room for disinfection and sterilization of tools
  • Have a restroom
  • Have a license for the shop
  • Have a practitioner license

The law also prohibits the use of piercing guns in Mexico! And, for the first time, we will also start to get inspections from health officials.

LBP_ed and annaWhile we were working towards this legislation, we were also making efforts in education. The APP’s Mexican Educational Seminars were held in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012, with attendees from over 25 States in Mexico in addition to piercers from Argentina, Costa Rica, Chile, Peru and Spain.

We have also continued to speak to health officials, to give feedback about the new laws, and to keep them informed about forming the association. Some of our suggestions were approved almost immediately, and they let us know that once we were legally consolidated we could work towards fine-tuning the law. On May 21, 2013, we officially became a legal association, the Asociación Latinoamericana de Body Piercing, A.C.

The LBP now

The LBP is currently working on:

  • Outreach to the piercing community
  • Getting the word out about the LBP
  • Working on press kits and promotional items
  • The 2014 Seminars (which will be held on November 4 to 7 in Mexico City)
  • Working to get the LBP accepted as an Associate Corporate Member of the APP
  • Working closely with with health officials to fine-tune the current laws in Mexico into comprehensive and effective legislation
  • Raising the standards of body piercing in Latin America

As you can see, we have been working on this for a while. Much has happened, and it’s just the start! We wish to keep sharing many achievements and growth. On behalf of the LBP Board Members, to the APP for their support and inspiration, and to our international body piercing brothers and sisters: Thank you.

Point #65: A Client’s Guide to Jewelry Sizing

James Weber headshotBy James Weber
Infinite Body Piercing

Editor’s note: This article was written with clients considering stretching in mind, and was reprinted with permission from infinitebody.com.

When stretching a piercing from one size to the next, it’s obviously important to select the correct size jewelry. But when choosing what to buy, it’s important to know how body jewelry is measured.

The first thing to realize is that while the thickness of jewelry is measured in diameter, what your body feels is circumference. An excellent overview of this is included in issue #2 of Piercing Fans International Quarterly. (Thanks to Jim Ward, you can download the article here.)

The second is this: body jewelry is measured in several different systems, depending on its size and country of origin. This means there are slight deviations in size with different jewelry types. While slight variances in smaller sizes this shouldn’t affect your ability to stretch too much, once you hit larger sizes this can make a big difference.

Here’s an overview of the different systems of measurement:

Brown and Sharpe (American Wire Gauge System)

Body jewelry manufactured in the United States is typically measured in the American Wire Gauge (AWG) System, also called the Brown and Sharpe measuring system. This wire gauge system has been used since 1857 (predominantly in the United States and Canada) for measuring the diameters of round, solid, and nonferrous (not iron-based alloys) electrical conducting wire. This system is used for measuring the thickness of precious metals in the U.S. and was first used for making body jewelry by Jim Ward in the early years of The Gauntlet. He explains the choice in his book, Running the Gauntlet.

The standard gauge system used for steel wire is different from the Brown & Sharpe gauge system used for gold and silver. For the sake of consistency and to eliminate the necessity for more sizes of piercing needles, I felt it was necessary to have all the stainless steel wire custom produced to corresponding thicknesses.

To anyone who is not familiar with the Brown and Sharpe system it may not make much sense. AsPoint65-sizing the gauge number decreases, the thickness of the wire increases. In other words: 18 gauge is thinner than 16 gauge, which in turn is thinner than 14 gauge. This is because the number represents the number of operations used to produce a given gauge of wire, or the number of times a metal ingot must be pulled through a drawing die to make it smaller. Thinner wire requires more passes than thicker wire, hence the higher number for thinner material. Ever wondered why body jewelry gets thinner as the gauge number gets higher? This is the reason. Thus 2-gauge wire would need two passes through the die, 22-gauge will will need significantly more. Make sense?

Imperial Units (or Customary Units)

In the United States, we’ve fought hard against the adoption of the metric system. Unlike most of the rest of the world we still use a structure based on the imperial system, defined by the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824. When body jewelry sizes get larger than 00 gauge (or sometimes 000 gauge) it is too large to measure with a Brown and Sharpe measurement, and under the imperial system is typically measured in inches and/or fractions thereof: ½, 9/16,  ⅝, etc. Plugs for stretching manufactured in the U.S. are most commonly available in increments of 1/8 (or sometimes 1/16) of an inch.

The Metric System

Based on the system introduced in France in 1799, the metric system (or “SI” or the “International System of Units”; in French the “Système international d’unités”) is the official system of

Countries not using the metric system. (Courtesy of Wikimedia.)
Countries not using the metric system. (Courtesy of Wikimedia.)

measurement in almost every country in the world—with the United States being a notable exception. (Currently, the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar are the only countries to not have officially adopted the metric system.)  Unlike the imperial system, the metric system uses interrelated base units and a standard set of prefixes in powers of ten. The system of measurement we’re concerned with for body jewelry is the one for length: meters, with the smaller division being centimeters and millimeters.

Why is this important?

When shopping for the right-sized jewelry, at my studio we often advise our clients to think of it like buying shoes: Proper size is important, and no matter how much you want it, jewelry that doesn’t fit will not work. Nowhere is this more true than when selecting jewelry with which to stretch your piercing. Jewelry that is too small is a waste of money, while jewelry that is too large can damage your piercing.

But when I buy a piece of jewelry, the size is the size, isn’t it? The short answer is: not always.

 Where the jewelry is made matters. For example, when you buy a plug that is sized at ½”, a U.S.-produced plug will, more likely than not, be exactly ½” (or 12.7mm), where one made elsewhere will most likely be 12mm (or maybe 12.5mm). Often, these sizes line up as a close approximation to each other—but not always. For example: If you’re buying 2-gauge glass plugs they will most likely be made from 6mm stock. (True 2 gauge is approximately 6.5mm.) Going up to 0g will mean jumping to 8.25mm, while many companies who sell jewelry manufactured in metric sizes will offer 7mm plugs—often sold as 1 gauge plugs—which will be a much more reasonable next size.

And remember: Your jewelry is measured by diameter, while your body feels the circumference. Jewelry measured in the Brown and Sharpe (gauge) system or imperial units (inches) can be especially problematic, as circumference measurements are often not incrementally consistent. This means while one size to the next may feel easy, while the next stretch can be incredibly difficult.

Confused? It can be daunting, but the point to take away is this: Educate yourself and pay attention to the size of the jewelry you are buying. When buying retail jewelry, find out where the jewelry is manufactured—or at the very least have them take calipers to the piece and tell you exactly what size you’ll be purchasing. Understand how the different sizing systems measure what you are buying; this can make the difference between buying jewelry that is too close to what you are currently wearing, jewelry too large, or something that is the perfect size. Just like the wrong-sized shoes can turn a easy walk through the city to a crippling ordeal, the correctly sized jewelry can be the difference between a happy piercing and an angry one.

Point #65: Changing Myself While Changing Others

Jezebel Voule headshotBy Jezebel Voulé
TRX

What has been your favorite piercing moment? It is a question that has haunted me since the first time I was asked. An echo of this makes the voice in my head always think “maybe this piercing will be the one that defines my piercing career.” Several people have shared their defining moments with me: some of these turning points involved meeting their piercing idol while, for others, it was defined by where they worked, who they worked with (or worked on), and, in some cases, a paycheck. The ways people have been affected by their careers are as unique as the individuals who had the experiences.

Most days there are no moments that change me, or at least affect me in a drastic way. I take a client in, bond with them and then let them go, hoping that we connected enough for them to return to me for their next piercing experience—or, better yet, remember my name to bring me more clients to bond with and release.

However, when asked about my favorite moment there is one I always relive. An older lady, at least seventy years old, came in to get her earlobe pierced. We took a moment chatting but as I started to get set up for the piercing she stopped me. “I need you to know that I have Hep C. I understand if you can’t pierce me.” After asking if she had talked to her physician about getting a piercing I smiled and said “Thank you for telling me but I have no problem piercing you. I take many precautions so that both my safety and yours are taken care of.” She was shocked that I didn’t respond like she had expected. She thought I would react poorly and then proceed to treat her as a leper, sending her on her way. Both she and her wife were overcome with joy. It was something she had wanted to do for a long time but had been afraid to get because she would have to expose a secret that had given her so many other bad experiences. (I later found out how much that experience changed her perception of herself. She, for a moment, felt like she was human rather than a disease and not worth common decency. I had felt like I had changed the world, and for her I had.)

Recently another experience left the same type of lasting impression on me. While at Omega Red Studios a man came in asking questions about his daughter. She had cancer and, as a result, had made a “bucket list.” On that list was a lip piercing. He wanted to help her fulfill her wishes and asked if I would be willing to perform such a task on her. I had replied that I would be willing, after I knew it was okay with her doctor. The next day he came back with a handwritten note. Skeptical that the doctor was in on this idea I Google searched the doctor and found out everything I could about not only her but the entire hospital. I talked to lawyers, her doctors, and parents about what I expected, what they should expect, and the young girl’s expectations. I did not hold back on making demands on what I would need to make a safe and positive environment for her. Many of them were personal things to increase my comfort. After all, my safety is just as important as hers.

It took three days to come to an agreement on piercing her. After speaking with the doctor we decided the nostril would be a more acceptable piercing rather than the lip. I learned that the reason there was so much passion behind her parents getting this one thing done was because she had just received a dire prognosis. The likelihood that she would be alive long enough to even see her piercing heal was slim. She had fifteen things that she wanted to do before she died. Her parents chose this task, as it was most obtainable, and came in search of me. Completing one of her bucket list tasks was important in helping her fight the feeling that all was lost for this fourteen year old whose life was on a count down. The before and after effect on her life was immediate. She went from a child who looked and acted sickly to a young girl who wanted to walk around with her father as she felt a kind of rejuvenation.

***

These moments have stuck with me, as it has been these moments that have pushed me to realize how much I could help the world just with a tiny prick of my needle. Sometimes a navel piercing is more than a belly adornment, it is a story—a celebration—of a woman reclaiming her body. It amazes me how much a person can be changed from something that, for me, is just a way of life: the impact of one life to another. Everyone has different reasons for loving their job. So please take a moment and relish yours.

 

Point #65: The Piercing Password, Daith

 Jef Saunder headshotBy Jef Saunders
Rockstar Body Piercing

Few people are aware of what a shibboleth is, but they are familiar with one very famous one: Lollapalooza. Lollapalooza, made famous by the Perry Farrell’s traveling music fest, is familiar to us. It is relevant on several levels to the piercing industry, as Lollapalooza was, for many people across the United States, their first exposure to body piercing. Whether it be through traveling piercers like Eve Zamora, Gadhi, Cricket Keene, Allen Falkner, and Ken Coyote, or the modified Jim Rose Circus Sideshow: the Lollapalooza tour was essential to early 1990’s body piercing culture.

But the Lollapalooza I am referring to is the shibboleth “lollapalooza.” A shibboleth is a word that one culture can pronounce easily, but another cannot. U.S. Forces in the Pacific theater of World War II would hear other soldiers walking in the woods, or in the dark. If they were unsure as to whether they were American or not, they would yell, “Say Lollapalooza!” An American can say this word easily. Japanese soldiers could not. This shibboleth protected American soldiers from ambush, and the mispronunciation potentially cost Japanese soldiers their lives. [1]

The word shibboleth, and the first recorded concept of this kind of password, is from the bible. Specifically Judges 12:5-6 (King James version quoted) “And the Gileadites took the passages of Jordan before the Ephraimites: and it was so, that when those Ephraimites which were escaped said, Let me go over; that the men of Gilead said unto him, Art thou an Ephraimite? If he said, Nay; Then said they unto him, Say now shibboleth: and he said sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand.” [2]

The two previous mentions of a shibboleth are primarily a racial/cultural mispronunciation, but if we get to the heart of the matter, a shibboleth is a password into a culture. Arguably, body piercing has several of these: “plugs” versus “gauges,” “philtrum” versus some sort of “bite.” Some piercers still mispronounce “labret!” (For the record, it’s a hard “T” sound). But none is as nonsensical as the pronunciation of the daith piercing (doth, like “goth” with a “d”). The uninformed cannot wrap their heads around that pronunciation, and this makes it a shibboleth.

I had heard several versions of how the daith received its name, but I decided to go straight to the

Example of a daith piercing, by Jef Saunders.
Example of a daith piercing, by Ken Coyote.

source.  I called Erik Dakota, the first person to do the daith, and asked him how his client came up with the name.  Erik explained to me that he had a wonderful, intelligent and creative client named Theresa, who was “a good Catholic girl” (which hopefully dispels some of the inaccurate versions of the story).  She asked Erik if he could perform a unique piercing, what we now call the daith.  Erik assessed her anatomy.  Yes indeed; her tissue could support the piercing, but the cartilage was too rigid to put a straight needle through.  Erik had lots of experience curving needles to perform another piercing he originated, the rook, so he curved the needle, performed the piercing, and asked Theresa to name it.  Theresa had been teaching herself Hebrew, and decided it took quite a bit of intelligence to perform this piercing.  She elected to name her new piercing the “daith,” which she said was the Hebrew word for intelligence. The name, pronunciation, and spelling stuck.

I’ve had a bit of trouble confirming this spelling and/or the meaning for the word “daith.”  Internet searches and talks with friends who speak Hebrew have pointed me toward the word daath, or da’at, or da’as, meaning knowledge. [3] (For example, someone who is knowledgeable in Jewish law is “da’as torah.”)  I have also found reference to “daath” on the Tree of Life on Kabbalistic websites. [4] The spelling “daith” remains elusive to me.

I think it is important to note that neither Erik Dakota nor his client Theresa had any intention of this piercing having spiritual overtones; it was simply a good name that fit a piercing that had to be performed by a knowledgeable, intelligent piercer.

I have heard several piercers suggest we change the spelling to “daath” or just make it as easy as possible for our clients, and spell it “doth.”  Our industry seems to get particularly bothered by clients and piercers mispronouncing terms.  I am of a slightly different opinion.

We have been given a gift, in this unique spelling and counterintuitive pronunciation. I say: Let’s keep this our password. One of the joys of my job is meeting other informed, active piercers, and the rarer, but much appreciated, educated client. To hear “daith” pronounced correctly is music to my ears.  Only someone knowledgeable about our culture (at least a little) will pronounce “daith” correctly, and this uniquely confirms Theresa’s initial intention.  It is a nod of respect to Erik and his client.  Daith is our shibboleth; it is our pass into our culture, and we are well served to preserve it.

References:

1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibboleth
2 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+12%3A5-6&version=KJV
3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da’at
4 http://www.mirach.org.uk/basic/daath.html