Posts tagged body piercing archives

Point 78: BPA: Silver Anchor – Shawn Porter

Editor’s Note: This article was compiled by Kendra Jane Berndt from existing sources written by Shawn Porter. In addition to writing for Modblog, Shawn also edits the Scarwars site, the more frequently updated Occult Vibrations tattoo blog as well as his personal diary at Sacred Debris. Without his collection of writings, photographs, and personal accounts much of the history of body piercing would not be documented and archived as it currently is. I would like to thank Shawn for his continued work, as I was only able to compile the following information because of his work.

Zephyrhills, Florida was first incorporated as a city in 1914. According to the 2000 Census it was home to 10,833 residents, many of whom were over 65 and retired. It’s close to Tampa and to my hometown of Plant City, and can boast to being the birthplace of several famous NASCAR drivers, an American Idol finalist, and notorious Ghoul Carl Tanzier.

It was also, for a few years at least, the Body Modification capital of the world.

Far from the cultural meccas of the West Coast, Zephryhills was where advanced body modification pioneer Mr. Jay (Jack Yount) settled after his wife passed away and he retired from American Standard Plumbing, where his only full apprentice Mike Natali lived and where famed ‘Modification Doctor’ Ronald Brown made frequent visits for underground surgery. It  was also the home base of Big Ed Fenster and the Silver Anchor Body Jewelry Company.

At the time finding body piercing jewelry was no easy task. In the 1980s and early 1990s manufacturing companies were few and far between. It was not available at every mall or website, and most tattoo shops didn’t have piercers to buy it from/install it for you. The Gauntlet, Spain’s Customs, Pleasurable Piercing, The Good Art Company, Toucan for gold, Wildcat in the UK, and Fenster’s Silver Anchor were the big names at the time. Pre-internet. Some had catalogs while others had stapled and xeroxed price sheets, included with your order. When I first started buying from Silver Anchor they didn’t even have a retail price list since they only served wholesale clients. Big Ed Fenster – a nudist, swinger, and friend of both Jack and Sailor Sid Diller – owned the business. Silver Anchor shared its name with Sid’s Ft. Lauderdale tattoo studio and was located in a small house that served as the office and Ed’s living quarters. There were a few satellite trailers where the jewelry was manufactured.

A jeweler at Silver Anchor, circa 1980s.

Twenty something years later I still contend that Silver Anchor produced the finest quality body jewelry of all of the companies that were around back then. Open to interpretation I know, but during their “good years” with Mike Natali as GM and his partner Chuck as shop manager they put out top notch large gauge jewelry that had a mirror finish that I’ve never seen rivaled. Chuck was one of the few jewelers who, by hand, could produce a ring for a P.A. in 1/2” stock with an inner diameter of 1/2” with a threaded 5/8” ball that fit perfectly. Sure, some of their output would make a devoted APP acolyte cringe; the 00g externally threaded barbells I had made as a present to myself on my 17th birthday would likely cause a panic, but the threads were buffed for easy insertion and years later when I finally gifted them to a friend they had retained a perfect finish.

In my time visiting the shop – with Jack at first and then later to spend time with Mike and Chuck – it was always an adventure. My brother and I would meet up with Brian Skellie, Kevin Covella, and Rob Moore, maybe pack a few orders (when I first started going I was 16) and be in awe that we finally found people who ‘got’ it. Sometimes we’d continue on to Jack’s house and document a modification procedure, meet some of his out of town friends, or just sit in the pool or hot tub and enjoy the company. The shift was taking place quickly from an older gay demographic to younger people who were taking on modification as a culture and not a kink and Jack was grooming us to help bridge the gap. Visits to Silver Anchor had them asking us questions about making ‘earlets’ since more people were stretching their lobes and despite having made custom 1/2 question mark shaped nipple jewelry they had never seen a stretched earlobe before mine.

You have to appreciate dealing with Ed – whose entire history was with piercing as a sexual thing being able to make some of the most complicated “u-tubes” imaginable, but being completely vexed by the mechanics of a plug for stretched ear lobes. U-tubes were urethra tubes, which later went on to be universally referred to as ‘Prince’s Wands’ and Ed specialized in them. I remember sitting at the desk one day packing orders and seeing this MONSTER of a tube in his inbox (back when the inbox was actually a box and not an email account) that he had made for himself. At the thickest it was a full 5/8″ with 1″ balls and 4g posts for his apadravya. I remember thinking that it looked more like a billy club than a dick accessory. Ed looked at me sheepishly and said “my girlfriend likes me to wear this when I fuck her.”

Emil Gundelach, Big Ed Fenster, and Mev Chapman (seated)

Ultimately, under Mike’s direction Silver Anchor became a powerhouse of a company. At the time it was a seller’s market, and with body jewelry being as rare as it was, paying over $20 wholesale for a 12g ring wasn’t uncommon. When things got too big the stresses started to appear and eventually Mike and his partner moved on to start Bravo! Body Jewelry. Several of the jewelers Ed had hired did the same, and before long over saturation of a niche product flooded a small area. Tattoo shops started selling body jewelry. Tampa, the nearest major city to Zephryhills, saw a piercing only shop open under the name of Leather Tiger – that’s a story in and of itself, with a ‘head piercer’ who had to have PFIQ’s “Pierce with a Pro” open when he’d do a piercing. Once Jack Yount passed away things mostly fell apart.

In time Silver Anchor closed it’s doors. I’m not sure what happened to it’s back stock or employees. I’m not even sure what happened to Ed Fenster. But I still have a handful of my Silver Anchor jewelry in their original bags that I keep for old times’ sakes.

Here’s a video featuring Ed (with very little clothing, sterile or aseptic technique, or gloves – remember when it was filmed) that I posted on Modblog back in 2008. It’ll hopefully give you a glimpse into the sexual nature of pre-1990s body piercing/modification.

It must have been about 1991 when I first met Mike Natali; two decades later and we’ve taken to calling our first meeting ‘guiche day’ as both of us were at Jack Yount’s Zephyrhills, Florida house to have ours pierced when we were introduced and became fast friends. Mike became an older brother/uncle figure to my brother and I. Under his leadership, Ed Fenster’s Silver Anchor body jewelry company experienced massive growth and his own Bravo! Body Jewelry set a high bar for the companies that followed.

In late August I traveled down to Tampa to reconnect with Mike and to record an oral history with him about his introduction to Jack and Ed Fenster, his time at SA and Bravo and his career as a body piercer. The videos need to be edited and a transcript made, but it was really great to spend the afternoon with him and get his story told.

Editor’s note: When I spoke with Shawn in February of 2017, these items still required transcribing.

Point 75: An Interview with Gus Diamond – Matte Erickson

Matte Erickson headshotMatte Erickson
Alpha-Omega Body Piercing

The Body Piercing Archive presents a new series of informal interviews with some of the most interesting people in the body piercing community. Often the importance of the spoken word and the stories handed down from one generation to another is forgotten. We hope you enjoy this lighthearted (sometimes [pierced] tongue-in-cheek) insight into our industry’s history.

Our first interview is with Gus Diamond, a piercer, cigar smoker, long-time supporter of the APP, Super Volunteer, and most importantly a pirate. Gus is also a member of a very exclusive club that many people don’t even know exists; he has attended all 20 Conferences (this year will be 21) that the APP has held. A larger than life personality, yet, humble beyond measure. Some just know him as Gus. Others know him as Funky Gus. Some, only know him as Smee. A few of us still remember he was the one that pierced Britney Spears’s navel back in 2000. So without further ado….

Gus Diamond at APP Conference 2015
In Gus We Trust

BPA: How long have you been around piercing? What is your history?
Gus: The first non-ear piercing [was] in ‘89; I got my nipple pierced while in Navy Deep Sea Dive school (because divers pierced their nipples and “dicks”). When I started piercing I was a hack piercer (from ‘90-’93) and opened my first shop in ‘94. I opened Paragon in ‘95 and sold it in ‘01 before leaving Hawaii.

BPA: Who has most influenced you over your body piercing career?
Gus: Allen Falkner, him and I were friends before piercing.

BPA: You are part of an elite group of people that has attended all 20 Conferences. What were the first conferences like?
Gus: It was amazing being in the same room with so many people that wanted to make our industry better.

BPA: What are a few of your favorite Conference memories?
Gus: There are too many to list, but if I had to narrow it down, it would be the first few Conferences in ‘96-’98, the chance to meet so many like-minded people for the first time, it is unforgettable.

BPA: When did you start volunteering at Conference and how did that affect your viewpoint on the experience?
Gus: 2003 was my first year volunteering. I feel everyone should do it at least one year.

BPA: Where do you see Conference in another 20 years?
Gus: In Las Vegas

BPA: Many of us know that in your spare time you are a pirate. Why a pirate, say instead of a buccaneer?
Gus: I’ll be a Pirate, Buccaneer, or Privateer whatever pays the most… 😉

BPA: What keeps you busy now that you no longer pierce?
Gus: I am a video editor, but am still looking for a quality shop to help and work with in my area.

BPA: Who have been your role models over your involvement in the piercing industry?
Gus: Allen Falkner, Pat Pruitt, and Steve Joyner just to name a few.

BPA: If you could pass on one piece of advice, what would it be?
Gus: Save it while you can; some day you may not be making it like you did.

BPA: Puppies or kittens?
Gus: Kittens.

Gus Diamond

We hope you enjoyed this quick insight into one of the friendliest faces at Conference, Gus Diamond. Ask him to share a great story from Conferences past when you see him in July; he has lots. We hope you look forward to our future interviews in The Point. If there is someone specific you would like to see us interview please email us at archive@safepiercing.org.

Point 74: Charles Gatewood Remembered – Kendra Jane B

Kendra Jane headshotKendra Jane Berndt
Managing Editor of Content & Archives

Charles Gatewood, 73, had an indisputable impact on our industry, although he was never a piercer. On Thursday, April 29, 2016 Charles passed away due to complications from a fall on April 8, 2016. According to Betty Gatewood, Charles’s sister, the earlier fall from the third floor balcony of his apartment was a “suicide attempt as he had left several notes behind.”1 No matter the cause of his death, the burden of grief is not eased.

Charles Gatewood black and white photographIn addition to numerous private collections, Charles Gatewood’s images have been archived in over a dozen libraries and universities across the United States. The Gatewood Archive is currently curated at the Bancroft Library at University of California, Berkeley, which is now the steward of the lion’s share of the Gatewood Archive. Before his death, Charles Gatewood donated his video archive to the Body Piercing Archive. We digitized the first ⅓ of the collection last year, with the remaining ⅔ to be digitally preserved this year.

The Gatewood Archive contains several thousand vintage and modern silver prints, 250,000 slides and negatives, plus contact sheets, proof prints, personal papers, correspondence, over a thousand books, and special collections. The archive also contains three films (including a copy of Dances Sacred and Profane) and a selection of prints by other fine art photographers.2

In our winter issue, we’ll thoroughly explore the incredible impact Charles had on our industry.Charles Gatewood Photographs - Badlands

“Charles Gatewood, the man known as ‘the anthropologist of the forbidden’, has been documenting America’s sexual underground and alternative subcultures since the 1960s,”

“And though his name may not be that familiar to some younger pervs whose knowledge of fetish history is not that broad, the chances are that even these people will instantly recognize some of his best known images… Gatewood’s work can be traced back to photographs that appeared in the late ’80s ReSearch publication “Modern Primitives,” the seminal work on body modification cults and characters, which introduced the original Modern Primitive, San Francisco’s Fakir Musafar, to a much wider audience.”

“Much of the activity that Gatewood documented on the margins of society in the ’70s, ’80s and early ’90s is now part of contemporary youth culture, today, tattooing is commonplace, and pop stars regularly appear in SM-influenced attire. As sexual and body modification practices once seen as radical and taboo become increasingly accepted by the mainstream consciousness, Gatewood’s photography can be seen as showing the way.”

—Fetish newsletter, TheFetishistas

1 New York Times, May 4, 2016 “Charles Gatewood, Photographer of Extremes, Dies at 73,” by William Grimes http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9B0DEEDF1E31F930A25755C0A961948260
2 Wikipedia
– Gatewood, Charles (1999). Badlands. Goliath. ISBN 3980587649.
– Gatewood, Charles (1999). Badlands. Goliath. p. 17. ISBN 3980587649.
– Donohoe, Joe; Lynn Rubenzer (October 2012). “Charles Gatewood: Story of the Eye”. Specious Species (Six): 19–30.
– Gatewood, Charles (1975). Sidetripping. Strawberry Hill Books. ISBN 0891550011

Point 74: The Eye of the Needle – A Book Review – Kendra Jane B

The Eye of the NeedleThe Eye of the Needle by Pauline Clarke
Second edition 1984
ISBN 0952117509
Published in 1992 by PAUK,
153 Tomkinson Rd, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 8DP England

KendraJaneA Book Review by Kendra Jane B
Body Piercing Archive

It is important to keep in mind the time frame this was published and how its purpose in a library or collection will have changed since its original publication. If this review had been written 20 years ago – when this book was one of the few available on body modification – it would have been an important and excellent educational tool for both the enthusiast as well as those considered professional piercers. Keep in mind that at this time there were very few piercing establishments that offered individuals who pierced as a profession.

Fast forward to now, when the educational body of literature for the body modification industry has grown significantly; this text now serves much better as a historical account as opposed to an educational reference. I also see it as a very important piece of the history of our industry, helping to bring piercing from the kink and fetish world (which you can tell influence this book quite heavily) to the more mainstream.

“Press about piercing at that time [the early ‘90s] was written by us for us: PFIQ. Body Play. Body Art and Piercing World out of the UK. For many of us—myself included—these publications opened our eyes to a completely new world. My aspirations to be as a piercer and body modification artist were directly shaped by what I read in these publications.

And now there is the internet. Piercers today are introduced to the world of piercing and body modification with a flood of information that was not readily available in years past. Sites like rec.arts.bodyart and BMEzine.com shaped body modification for the new generation. The problem in years past was too little information was available; now it’s too much information to sort through” – James Weber The Point: Issue 41

It is interesting to note that the above comment by James Weber was 33 issues ago; it has been over eight years since that statement. Many of those websites are no longer what they were in readership or participation and others have simply been replaced all together. Our industry is experiencing unprecedented and exponential growth. This makes books such as Eye of the Needle so much more important to preserve and archive as they are the written history of our industry. This book is an indispensable addition to any collector’s library.

Image of woman with numerous ear and nostril piercingsAs a historical text this book offers a look at what it was like for the body modification enthusiast in its infancy, not just in North America, but worldwide. It is a unique combination of instructional text containing brief descriptions of healing times and proper jewelry used to perform certain piercings, including septum, navel, and nipples. Male and female genital piercings are also discussed later in the book. These small written tutorials – complete with hand drawn diagrams by Alan Oversby (aka Mr. Sebastian)—are a key part to our history.

At the time this was written, few piercings in North America were done for fashion reasons; most body modification was rooted in sexuality or due to the love of physical adornment. The author mentions that at the time of publication, “Sleepers” were the most common, comfortable style of jewelry. She mentions repeatedly that the dominant styles of jewelry at the time were ball closure rings (BCR). This is what UK and English speaking Europeans have always referred to this style of jewelry as, continuing to this day. Whereas North American English speakers call this style of jewelry captive bead rings (or CBR). Most jewelry available was made from gold, silver, or surgical steel. This is also the time that men’s ear piercings went from having very strong political ties to fashion statements. However nostril piercings were still rare and piercings like the septum were only seen at home or at private functions. Clarke explains that piercing went from the enthusiast to the public for fashion.

The Eye of the NeedleClarke begins the list of piercings in this text with facial piercings, such as the lip and ear. Healing times are subjective and outdated, being quite a bit shorter than what we may suggest now. She sites the piercing gun as the most common method of performing an ear piercing. However, she does state that if you want to wear a ring immediately the piercing will need to be done with a hollow needle, but states that this method is slower and more painful. This is important, indicating that even decades ago people realized there were differences between piercings performed with piercing guns and hollow needles.

From here she moves on to talk about the navel piercing. Much of the information included for this piercing still holds true. Nipple piercings are the next to be covered and receive more attention than any other piercing at this point in the book. This, again, indicates a direct link between the roots of the piercing movement and the kink and fetishists of the time. This latter section for the book includes several excellent photos highlighting nipple piercings and their accompanying jewelry in both color and black and white. These collections of photos are an excellent window into the rise in popularity of piercing in the ‘80s and ‘90s. However the anatomy of a nipple piercing that is covered in this literature would now be considered outdated; as an industry standard, it is now agreed upon that it is not necessary to pierce into the areole no matter what the anatomy of the nipple.

From here, Clarke goes on to give answers to the most commonly asked questions about body piercing, such as “does it hurt?” Trying to address the ideas of pain versus pleasure, and how one can become the other, again ties the roots of piercing to the S/M and kink cultures. She also offers other examples, stating that the simple act of adorning the body is able to affect the physiological aspect of a person’s well being. She supplements these ideas with several first hand accounts or testimonials from people and why they have chosen to seek out body piercings and their motivations in becoming modified.

From what would have been modern accounts of body modification, Clarke goes further into what she feels are the different aspects of body piercing. She refers first to personal expression, such as dressing for pleasure, and then moves on to discuss the idea of collectors – those who had a true passion for piercing and modification. As with previous sections of the book, Clarke includes several pages of both color and black and white photographs as examples.

Moving onto the next section of the book, Clarke talks about the pioneers – those people we look to as the founders of the modern body piercing movement as a whole. From Doug Malloy to Alan Oversby, she offers their accounts and written dialogue and as well as her stories of their meetings and visits. She starts with a reprinting of the Adventures of Body Piercing by Doug Malloy. This is followed by a story by England’s pioneer in the modification world, Mr. Sebastian. She rounds out this collection of history with letters and stories from Will and Ethel Granger.

The remainder of the book is largely dedicated to genital piercings accompanied with personal testimonials, great photographic examples, and more illustrations from Alan Oversby. These illustrations are much like the earlier examples, going over the technical aspects of these piercings (accurate and citing best practices for the time of publication). The focus on text and images related to genital piercings acts as another great indicator of the connection between sexuality and the roots of the piercing industry, not only in North America, but in other parts of the world as well.

To round out her book Clarke briefly touches on stretching, the tribal roots of our industry, and nipple training. She closes the book by offering her own account of her modification journey, including her thumb web piercings and her labia piercings done by Mr. Sebastian. As a historical piece of literature this personal account really gets demonstrates how far our industry has come in the past 40 years, from bedrooms and basements to board rooms and run ways. Although Clarke’s book no longer serves as an educational reference, it would have when first published. It offers a colourful and intimate account of body piercing as it was in the beginning. It is the perfect example of how kinks, lovers, and BDSM practitioners helped to bring piercing from the closet to what has become common day practice.

One important thing to note is that the very last page of this publication is a set of standards that were set forth for UK piercers by PAUK (Piercing Association of the United Kingdom) and the Director of Public Health; this would have been one of the first sets of standards for the professional piercer, dictating what and how they may do parts of their job.

About the Author Pauline Clarke
Clarke married in 1959. It was through her husband’s interest in body piercing that led her to put compose this book. After having two kids and writing children’s novels, her aspirations had always been to become a journalist.

It was after her first tattoo in 1965 that the door was really opened for what was to become her future and the focus of her journalistic career. By 1981 she had become much more involved in the tattoo community and in 1983 she was named Miss Tattoo, Great Britain. This led to many magazine features and interviews, and eventually to the creation of PAUK (Piercing Association of the United Kingdom). She then followed up with a quarterly publication called Piercing World.

The Eye of the Needle References