Posts tagged kendra jane

Point 86: From the Editors – Kendra Jane B.

“Optimism is a strategy for making a better future. Because unless you believe that the future can be better, you are unlikely to step up and take responsibility for making it so.”

—Noam Chomsky

Kendra Jane B. & Marina Pecorino, 2017 APP Conference

I am a glass half full, the sun will come out tomorrow kind of person; a believer that everyone deserves a second chance and that humans are innately good beings. I’m an eternal optimist if you will.

When I started piercing almost a decade ago it was amazing; piercing became an overnight passion I didn’t know I had. I wanted to learn everything I could about every aspect of our industry. I dove in head first. I have had the privilege of being chosen as an Al D. Scholar, and have now become a longtime conference volunteer. I have been a contributing writer and an Editor for The Point for several years. The culmination of all this hard work and diligence has been the opportunity to serve as this organization’s Vice President.  Looking back, it honestly seems so surreal. I have met soulmates, best friends, and my chosen family. Being a part of this industry has allowed me to be the change I wanted to see. I wanted to make a difference and this industry gave me the chance to do that.

Kendra Jane B. 2016 APP Conference

Although I may be a glass half full kinda of girl, I would be lying if I led you to believe that my time in the piercing industry has been all sunshine and lollipops. It is very easy to let piercing throw off a work life balance, as it seems piercers like to eat, breathe, and sleep piercing. In my case it allowed me to indulge in my first choice for self harmful behaviour, being a workaholic. I used my career as an excuse to miss family gatherings, maintain toxic relationships, and to define myself as a person through my career alone. This sadly means that I, like so many piercers I know, have spent the past few years teetering ever so cautiously on the precipice of complete burnout.

Badur Ramji & Kendra Jane B., 2016 APP Conference
Photo by Autumn Swisher

After almost a decade in this industry it was a strange reality for me to have worked so hard for so long to get exactly where I wanted to be, only to realize that place was not at all like I had envisioned it. I am so very proud to say that I feel I have made real changes within the piercing industry, but I am now realizing the changes I’ve  made  in myself during my involvement in the industry are the real prize. I have said it before and I will say it again, this industry has taught me self worth, the ability to set boundaries, and to stand up for what I believe in. The piercing industry has also shown me that it is ok to step aside when you are no longer the best person for the task at hand, and the time has come for me to step aside and let the next shepherds of our industry take the lead.

Kendra Jane B. & Caitlin McDiarmid, 2018 APP Conference
Photo by Shanna Hutchins

I believe that this industry and this publication deserve a new voice, the voice of the next generation of piercers. The time has come for me to say goodbye to The Point and my  role as Managing Editor. I would like to thank James Weber, Elayne Angel, Kim Zapata, Jim Ward, Caitlin McDiarmid and Marina Pecorino; whether they know it or not, each of them played an integral part in my editorial journey with this publication.

Kendra’s desk

Point 84: From the Editors – Kendra Jane B.

By Kendra Jane B. , Point Editor

Point Editors, Kendra Jane B. & Marina Pecorino

In our last issue of The Point, I spoke to being mindful in your preparation for Conference. I said I was going into it knowing what I wanted to get out of it. I had hoped to find a renewed connection, a connection with the people of our industry. Instead what I found was a renewed connection with myself.

This year was a wash of emotions, so here’s your warning; emotions ahead.

I sat in my room and contemplated all that was Conference. I had arrived 10 days prior and, man, was I ready to go home. Conference is a special place filled with the most special people, but it also comes with sacrifices of sleep, water, sleep, raw fresh vegetables, oh and did I mention sleep? So this year on my last night I decided to do something a bit different. I took myself out on a date. That’s right a me party, party of one. For most of my life I did not feel like I could be my true self, and as such I never wanted to spend time with myself. Through my journey within this industry and the past eight Conferences, I am so very happy to say I am 100% happy with who I am, what I believe, and where I have drawn my boundaries. This wouldn’t have been possible without the people I have met because of Conference. So at the end of this year’s very hectic week I celebrated myself and all I have accomplished with dim sum, hand pulled noodles, and mochi. I finally know what my truth is and I hope that your journey through the piercing community and Conference allows you to find your truths.

I hope you enjoy this look back through this year’s Conference.

Point #72: From the Editor – Kendra Jane Berndt

Point-70-From-the-Editor-Kendra-0.jpgKendra Jane Berndt
Managing Editor of Content & Archives

When I think back to the week of the 20th annual Association of Professional Piercers Conference, I am rendered almost speechless, and if you know me, that is difficult. PVD or post Vegas depression, as a few of us call it, has hit me especially strong this year. I find myself longing for the hugs, smiles, and the mental stimulation that Conference provides. I even miss the hustle and bustle, the over priced everything, and the smoke filled casino. At the same time I am relieved to sleep in my own bed, eat vegetables, and put into practice the learning from this year.

In this issue we will take a look through the photos, the stories, the awards, and the memories that made this year by far the best Conference I have ever been tooI am sure many others share the same sentiments as me. Each attendee will have their own favourite moments from this year. In fact some may have so many moments that picking a favourite is impossible. Personally I have been able to narrow it down to the evening of the Banquet prom. My own prom (or grad as we call it here in the Great White North) was less than perfect and, well, I would rather forget most of it honestly. However, prom at this year’s Banquet will forever be one of my happiest nights, filled with love, laughter, tears, and dancing; oh glorious dancing.

This year’s prom also gave me the chance to recognize someone very close to me, someone who has shaped the person I am and pushes me in the direction of the person I want to be. It was an absolute honour to speak to her hard work and dedication. This will forever be a memory I cherish. We love you, Caitlin. Why do I suddenly have a craving for pie?

Kendra Jane - Best Smile - 2015 Prom AwardsThe other moment that still makes me giddy like a 16 year old is the fact that you guysmy peerssaw it fitting to honour me with the “best smile in the industry”. I was shocked when I saw my name on the nomination ballot and even more so when my name was announced. You guys made me feel like the belle of the ball. Just thinking of all the smiles and love as we put this issue together has made the PVD a little more tolerable.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart to each attendee. You all contributed to my Conference experience. I will carry these experiences with me over the coming year until I can see you all again.

Point #63: Can Piercings Create Nickel Allergies?

Kendra JaneBy Kendra Jane

Nickel allergies and metal sensitivities are one of the most common allergies.  We, as piercers,  see the effects of this allergy on a regular basis.  It is an allergy that greatly affects one’s ability to properly heal body piercings, as well as to maintain them in a healthy manner.  A study was recently released at the annual of the American Contact Dermatitis Society which found that the risk of nickel and cobalt sensitivity increases in tandem with the number of body piercings. In other words, the more piercings you have, the more likely you are to develop nickel or cobalt sensitivities as a whole.

The study involved nearly 9,400 patch tested patients.  From the data collected, they found that younger patients were more affected than older patients, and females were more likely to be affected than males. With that said, it was surprisingly found that when looking directly at body piercing as a cause of the allergy, even in ear lobes, the allergy was more common in males.

Since nickel is one of the most common allergens for patch tested patients, and—as stated above—body piercing has been directly correlated with the development of said allergy, it only makes sense that piercers should be very aware of the quality of metal they are putting into the piercings they deal with. Nickel is tightly bound up in many forms of stainless steel, especially those simply labeled surgical stainless steel, and once the allergy has developed one will see a marked sensitivity to the metal and need to avoid it. This means using jewelry that is nickel or cobalt free. However, there are many suitable nickel free options.

The only quality recommended for use by the APP for steel is that it is certified to meet ASTM or ISO standards for surgical implant application, specifically ASTM F138 or ISO 5832-1. Surgical steel can be made of a variety of alloys many of which are present in lower quality body jewelry and only a few specific grades are proven biocompatible   (The Association of Professional Piercers has developed these standards based on the most up-to-date studies, such as that above as well as the historical data available.) An alternative to steel is titanium, and while it is an excellent alternative, one must still look for surgical implant grade specifically (Ti6Al4V ELI)—that is ASTM F136 or ISO 5832-2 compliant or commercially pure titanium at ASTM F67 compliant. There are also other options such as glass available for both new and healed piercings as well. For more information about APP approved body jewelry, please see the Jewelry for Initial Piercings or Jewelry for Healed Piercings brochures.

For more information about the study, click here.

 

Point #62: What age are body modifications appropriate?

Kendra JaneBy Kendra Jane

In most areas of the world, the body modification industry remains highly unregulated. This means tattoos and piercings are available to the masses regardless of sex, gender, or—in many places—age. In the past, societal pressures on conformity and reserved appearances were strong enough to sway most minors away from body modification.  However, the more popular and mainstream tattoos and piercings become, the more teenagers want them and believe that they are completely socially acceptable. Take a recent example that hit North American media like a wild fire:

Will and Jada Pinkett Smith’s 11-year-old daughter, Willow, was recently given a tongue-lashing on social media after posting a picture of herself sporting a tongue piercing on Instagram. Though she later revealed that it was in fact a fake, magnetic tongue ring, people were already whipping their opinions back and forth about whether young people are too vulnerable to make permanent (or potentially scarring) decisions about their bodies. The issue: What is classified as “too young”? (CNN, 2013 Jul 6)

For us as body modification artists the larger issue at hand is who is going to decide these things for us and our clients. Whether we like it or not regulations for our industry are either a reality for you already or may be in the near future.

Although the battle over modifications for teenagers is typically fought between parents and children (Hudson, 2012), with many examples such as Willow Smith and Instagram, this debate has now entered legislative bodies around the globe.  One of the latest examples comes from Australia, where legislation just went into place (November 2012) affecting when and what modifications minors can receive. An Australian newspaper (Adelaide Now) reported that The Summary Offences (Tattooing, Body Piercing and Body Modification) Amendment Act of 2011 included redefining body modification and its related terms. (These amendments were made to  the original Summary Offences Act 1953 as well as accompanying amendments to the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935.) The amendments covered everything from body branding and body implantation to tattooing, piercing, splitting and stretching—and even the sale of body modification devices to minors. (Check out our Legislation Update – South Australia article for more information about this new legislation, and all of the provisions of the new Summary Offences Amendment Act.)

Closer to home (for many of us) are the examples of Health Canada: although they provide guidelines to prevent the spread of infections, communicable diseases, they do not have a legally established age requirement for body piercing. Instead, professional body piercers and health authorities agree that these requirements are regulated at a provincial or municipal level, and where no requirements exist, it is left up to the individual operator’s judgement. (In British Columbia, for example, provincial recommendations on ear and body piercings call for parental consent on anyone under the age of 19.)

It is no surprise that, stateside, there are regulations being put into place everyday to ensure that modifications are happening in proper, hygienic environments  and on clients of consenting ages, but we are starting to see such legislation being implemented—or updated—around the world. As many recent articles in The Point have discussed, the internet and social media is a driving force for our industry. (For more on “Making Safe Piercing Viral,” click here.) Countless hours are spent by hundreds of thousands  of people every day, tweeting, blogging, reposting and pinning the next piercing we are going to do. This as a call to action; let us do our part to shift the balance from YouFail videos and botched piercings to perfectly placed, well-angled piercings with beautiful jewelry. As APP member April Berardi believes: we should share and share alike. Post your own knowledge, and share what other good piercers are doing. This will do just as much to boost your own clientele, and if you’re too busy to dedicate time to editing and posting your own work, then share, share, share.  Before we are told what we can’t do, let’s show them what we can. Where there are no regulations, we need to police ourselves and promote the change we want to see. Be proactive; we must be the catalyst to drive the changes we want to see.

In a 1970 article about Lyle Tuttle in Rolling Stone, journalist Amie Hill said this in regards to her visit to Tuttle’s studio:

Far from being the sinister, greasy hole that popular fiction associates with tattooing, Tuttle’s establishment is almost disappointingly clean and well-lighted.

That was almost forty years ago, when the concept of regulating and inspecting tattoo establishments was a new idea and not nearly as stringent as some are today. Those who recognized tattoos as an art form sought to protect the future of the career they held so dear (Hudson, 2012).

Those of you reading this are the next generation of piercers and modification artists; seek to protect the future of a career you hold dear. Does Paul Booth need someone telling him how to clean and sterilize his equipment? Does Bob Tyrell or Guy Aitchison need a written reminder not to smoke while tattooing or re-use ink? No – of course not! Even if no such laws were in place, artists of this calibre would continue to raise the bar of body art safety to ensure the continuation and reputation of their livelihood (Hudson, 2012). Although piercing may not garner the same attention that tattoo artists often gain, if the current state of growth and interest in body piercing continues, this will indeed be the case.  If all humans were mature and responsible enough to regulate themselves, we wouldn’t need laws of any sort, but that is not the case. The good news is that these rules should not pose any inconvenience to the true professionals, as they are probably already acting above and beyond these laws on their own.

Editor’s Note: Regardless of any local legislation being more lenient, the APP maintains that “for any piercing of a minor, a parent or legal guardian must be present to sign a consent form. Proof positive, state issued photo identification is required from the legal guardian, and a bona fide form of identification from the minor. In the event the parent has a different last name and/or address from the child, court documentation is needed to prove the relationship, i.e., divorce papers, or a remarriage certificate. Under no circumstances is it acceptable or appropriate for a piercer to perform piercing on the nipples or genitals of an individual under 18 years of age.”

 

Point #61: An Exploration of Pain

By Kendra Jane

“The secret of success is learning to use pain and pleasure, instead of having pain and pleasure use you. If you do that, you’re in control of your life. If you don’t, life controls you.”
– Tony Robbins

By all accounts, my own life has not been one that most would consider physically painful. I’ve suffered a single broken bone, a couple of surgeries, and a few car accidents, but all were fairly insignificant. On the other hand, my chosen body modifications stand out as having caused me far more pain, but they also offered me more healing than any prescription or medicine ever has.

Growing up watching National Geographic with my parents I would often find myself marveling at what I was seeing. So many lovely faces, so many modifications. All I could do was think about how beautiful these people were, and how different they were from anything else I had ever seen. The stretched lobes of the Dyak tribes of Borneo, the crocodile skin scarification of the Korogo People in the Sepik region of Papua New Guinea, and tattooed faces of the Ukit tribes from the Chin region of Borneo – each and everyone made a specific impression in my mind.

However,  and perhaps strangely enough, I only developed a superficial anthropological interest in anything other than the aesthetics of body modification. I believe that this is unfortunately where most North Americans’ interest in body modification stands: a vague curiosity of the unknown and the bizarre. Quotes such as the following only further support that idea:

“Bound feet, stretched necks, deformed skulls, flesh permanently marked and scarred, elongated ear-lobes- as suggested by the standard terminology of “mutilation” and “deformation” itself, these are practices that have long fascinated the West where they have been viewed as exotic distortions of the body.” (Mascia-Lees et. Al. 1992: 1).

Now with that being said, other than the concern about whether it will look nice, the majority of my clients all want to know, “Is this going to hurt?” or “Didn’t that hurt?”  My answer – always truthful – rings out in a single word, “Yes.”

One would think that the answer would be obvious. Pain is pain, right? What I cannot explain to them in one word is just how that pain, and the experience, will feel to them personally.

The International Association for The Study of Pain defines pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage.” However, pain is a symptom that cannot be objectively assessed. I cannot look at one of my clients and precisely know what hurts, how badly, and what that pain will feel like. Pain, therefore, is subjective; it is whatever the person experiencing it says it is. There will be no evidence – logical, empirical, theoretical, or even theological for that matter – that will be able to fully explain the multitudes of experiences pain can cause.

You see, pain is seen as an unpleasant sensation often caused by intense or damaging stimuli, such as stubbing a toe, burning a finger, or putting alcohol on a cut. This pain then motivates an individual to withdraw from damaging situations and to protect themselves while the wound heals.

“We rarely see the gifts that pain can bring, as a doorway to awareness” (Ferlic, 2005). This means that, for most people, the fear of the pain itself will cause us to avoid any and all situations that may cause pain. Yet pain, undoubtedly, is a central aspect of the lived realities of human experience.

Like most North Americans, I grew up afraid of pain. The idea of being harmed intentionally or otherwise was horrible. In order to better understand the multitudes of experiences that my clients may have (or may be hoping to have), I decided to explore my own personal definitions and experiences with pain. This in-depth exploration began two years ago when I was approached with the idea of becoming a body piercer. My first response was, “No. No, definitely not.” The idea of causing other people (what I, then, perceived to be) pain was not something I could do. However, from that point on, my idea of pain has been evolving to its current definition. This is not to say that it will be the same definition that my clients, colleagues, or peers will share. However, as important as it may be to define pain for myself, it is my own interpretation of pain and how it serves me that will better allow me to understand the varied motivations and experiences of my clients.

By most standards in my industry I am still relatively unmodified. The majority of my modifications have occurred in the past two years. In the beginning, the first few piercings I got were based on my limited knowledge and interpretations at the time, and were chosen for aesthetic reasons. As my apprenticeship progressed and I began to develop a much greater appreciation and understanding of modifications for different motivations, the reasons for my own modifications began to change. I now find that I want to get pierced to be able to better relate to my clients.

The latest addition to my modification collection is a scarification piece on my ribcage. It is by far the most personal piece – as well as the most “painful” piece – I’ve ever had done. Halfway through the procedure I was asked if I was all right, as tears streamed down my face. I grinned, laughed, and just managed to say, “Yes.” Four hours later I was tired, sore, and bleeding, and still had no idea that the most difficult parts were still to come.

Like with any modification, scarification is done for aesthetic, religious, and social reasons. In biomedicine, pain and the body are reduced to biological phenomena. In theological or spiritual terms, they are understood through penance, on one hand, and visionary suffering and sainthood, on the other.

“Modern pain, of course, normally chains us down to the material world. It keeps us centered in the flesh. It places us within the secular circle of medical science. On the other hand visionary pain, or pain viewed from a more theological perspective, acts in providing release into pure communion with something divine, it becomes not something to be cured or even endured but rather as a means of knowledge, offering access to an otherwise inaccessible understanding. Visionary pain employs the body in order to free us from the body. It initiates or accompanies an experience that escapes the time-bound world of human suffering” (Morris 1993: 135).

In various contexts, the deliberate infliction of pain in the form of corporal punishment is used as retribution for an offense, or for the purpose of disciplining or reforming a wrongdoer. At times, it has been used to deter attitudes or behaviors deemed unacceptable. Yet in other cultures, extreme practices such as rites of passage are highly regarded.

Fakir Musafar points to the Kulavarna Tantra that, in speaking of “the left-hand way” in Hinduism, says that “spiritual advancement is best achieved by means of those very things which are the causes of man’s downfall” (Blake, cited in Vale & Juno 1989: 204, Musafar Body Play issue #13: 7). Through bodily pain we learn what the modern primitives argue; in a controlled context, it becomes possible to utilize pain for positive ends.

For many tribal cultures, the modern primitives argue that, when accompanied by some measure of self-control, ordeals of pain give insight and maturity to the sufferer. As we face our fear of pain we gain self-confidence and pride. “The experience of pain allows us to test our physical and mental endurance under safe, controlled conditions” (Body Play issue #9: 4). Whereas science sees pain as negative and avoidable, the modern primitives hold pain to be a positive and useful experience, ascribing its rich personal and spiritual meanings.

After the journey I have taken, I look not at what modification or pain have done to me, but what that pain has given me. Pain has given me my life back. I am no longer afraid to try or to fail, no matter how painful it may be. I now believe that it is so much worse to live in fear–fear of pain, mental, physical, or otherwise. To do nothing, to walk away, then to travel forward, endure the pain, and come away with a richer perspective.

EDITOR’S NOTE: While the APP does not have any official stance on scarifcation or the rituals associated with pain and piercing, we are aware that individuals embark on body modifications for a variety of reasons. Whatever the reason – or modification – we simply encourage  recipients to use discretion and seek out qualified, educated, and highly experienced piercers, tattoo or body modification artists.