Category From the Editor

Point #73: From the Editor – Marina Pecorino

Comments Off on Point #73: From the Editor – Marina Pecorino read From the Editor, International, Issue 73, Social Media & Safe Piercing

Point-70-From-the-Editor-Marina-0.jpgMarina Pecorino
Managing Editor of Content & Statistics

I realized that in planning my pieces for this issue, I composed my outlines in terms of an almost methodical past—present—future format. As a result, it has become apparent to me that even when planning to discuss the current events of our industry, I can’t help but relate it back to where we came from and what has brought us to this point.

In the past, current events within the body modification community were defined within small regional groups, making the reach and influence fairly limited. Then as piercing enthusiasts became less closeted and more prevalent, conferences like the APP Conference and BMXnet, publications like PFIQ (Piercing Fans International Quarterly), and internet communities like BME became available. With this, the barriers of geography were broken and current events were defined more by the shared interests of individual communities. This allowed for a broader reach of knowledge and experience, and for enthusiasts to have more choice available in their involvement with specific interests. But information still had a trickling spread; trends were slower to be replaced with a newer, better, shinier thing.

With the overwhelming prevalence of social media and technology, the wealth of knowledge available is incredible and the reach of information is limitless. Trends change almost as quickly as they are born; in a matter of days, sweeping interest in a particular piercing placement or jewelry style can become global. Unfortunately, the same can be true in regards to misinformation and misconceptions surrounding placements, techniques, jewelry, and aftercare. It is our shared responsibility to ensure the quality and validity of piercing specific information available to our peers and the general public. Please be mindful of what you are sharing with the world.

However, even with this global reserve of knowledge, there are still specific concerns that only affect certain areas. In this issue, we are sharing some of those concerns seen during the revision process of body art laws and rules and regulations within the state of Ohio. You will also get a glimpse into the newly formed UKAPP and the issues specific to body modification artists in the European Union and the United Kingdom.

We hope that these articles help you gain an understanding and greater world view of what is happening within the professional realm of your peers.

Point 73: From the Editor – Kendra Jane Berndt

Comments Off on Point 73: From the Editor – Kendra Jane Berndt read Camp, From the Editor, Issue 73, Lifestyle, Social Media & Safe Piercing

Point-70-From-the-Editor-Kendra-0.jpgKendra Jane Berndt
Managing Editor of Content & Archives

Change: it is the only thing that is certain in life (other than death and taxes). So why is it that change is so hard for so many? I am one of those many. I consider myself in the know when it comes to what is hip and cool these days, but in all actuality I struggle everyday with the fast paced, significant changes that are happening in the world around us.

In order for any change to happen, small or big, someone has to start the wheels in motion. I am a firm believer in the idea that everyone can make a difference, and together a lot of small differences can lead to great change. We can all have a voice and make sure that it is heard. This is not to say that everyone will listen to your voice, nor will they like what you have to say, but neither of these reasons should ever stop you from using your voice. That is one of the things I like about the body piercing industry as a whole; there are so many accepted ways to get to the same final product. We may not all agree on how to get there, but for the most part we are all open minded enough to realize that this is the case.

Very recently we were able to get a lot of these different opinions together in the same room at the first ever APP Members Retreat in Georgia. You could see change happening— changes in perspectives, methodologies, self esteem—and know that further change in practices were to come as a result of attendance. I was so fortunate to be a part of that group and those changes.

As an organization the APP stands poised for its next change with the anticipated election of three new Board Members this winter. This year there are a number of outstanding candidates that will be in the running for these positions. We, as a membership, are so fortunate to have the ability to directly drive the changes that shape our organization. So when your ballot arrives, remember you have a voice and it should be heard.

I hope you enjoy Issue 73 of The Point as we take a look at some of the current issues and changes on the horizon for body piercing.

Point #73: From the Editor – Jim Ward

1 Comment read From the Editor, Issue 73

Jim Ward headshotJim Ward
Managing Editor of Design & Layout

November 17th this year marked the 40th anniversary of Gauntlet, the world’s first body piercing studio. For most of you reading this, it will be difficult to conceive what things were like for body mod enthusiasts back in those days. For many of us, our piercings were a sexual fetish that were well concealed under our clothing and revealed only to our most intimate of friends and acquaintances. We remained firmly in the closet.

With the exception of tattoos, other body mods were rare or nonexistent in the United States. Unless you lived in a colorful ethnic neighborhood, you were likely to see only piercings of the ears. Even then people with visible piercings could lose their jobs. Despite Gauntlet’s efforts, it was almost 15 years before things began to change. When that change came, it was explosive.

Modern Primitives appeared in 1989 and soon thereafter Shannon Larratt began advocating for more extreme body mods. Piercing shops began springing up like fungi after a spring rain. We saw fashion models strutting down runways sporting navel and nostril rings. Alicia Silverstone appeared in the Aerosmith music video Cryin’ getting her navel “pierced” by Paul King (admittedly, the piercing was staged). Suddenly, visible body mods were everywhere. They have become so common that virtually no one raises an eyebrow anymore.

As most of our readers know, I do the design and layout of The Point. When I was sent the image for this issue’s cover I was a bit taken aback by the lack of visible body modifications. Don’t get me wrong; it’s a great image of Rob Hill, a well-known and respected member of the APP community. But what, I asked my fellow editors and the APP Board, did it have to do with piercing. The response stunned me: “We are seeing more and more people that work in our industry who are choosing not to have visible modifications. We also realize that not everyone that reads our publication is a piercer or modification artist and we want to increase our readership, even having an article specifically aimed at reaching our clients in this issue.” [emphasis mine]

I have to laugh. It has been 40 years, and we have come full circle. While people may be choosing to keep their piercings private again, I can’t help wondering if piercings will ever be as erotic as they were all those years ago.

Point #71: From the Editor – Kendra Jane Berndt

Comments Off on Point #71: From the Editor – Kendra Jane Berndt read From the Editor, Issue 71

Point-70-From-the-Editor-Kendra-0.jpgKendra Jane Berndt
Managing Editor of Content & Archives

 

“We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.” —Winston Churchill

In our last issue we looked at where the APP came from and the trends we have seen over the past 20 years. In this issue we continue to celebrate this milestone by honouring some of the piercers and their accompanying volunteer work that helped grow the APP and the body piercing industry in a responsible and educated manner to what it is today.

al·tru·ism ‘altroō,izәm/ noun noun: altruism
1. the belief in or practice of disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others.
2. “some may choose to work with vulnerable elderly people out of altruism”
• Zoology
• behavior of an animal that benefits another at its own expense.

The idea of altruism or selflessness is the principle or practice of concern for the welfare of others. For many cultures it is the foundation for traditional viewpoints and it makes up core aspects of various religious traditions and secular worldviews. The concept of putting others before oneself has had a long history in philosophical and ethical thought, being the basis for more than one or two scientific debates. The term itself was originally coined in the 19th century by the sociologist and philosopher of science, Auguste Comte, and is often a major topic of debate for psychologists, evolutionary biologists, and ethologists.

Before I was a piercer I was a scientist. I studied animal biology, meaning I studied the ideas and concepts of altruism at great length. I was fascinated by the science behind the idea of giving. If we look at altruism in the context of biological organisms, it can be defined as an individual performing an action which is at a cost to themselves (e.g., pleasure and quality of life, time, probability of survival or reproduction), but benefits, either directly or indirectly, another third-party individual, without the expectation of reciprocity or compensation for that action. However, there have been many studies which have observed the effects of volunteerism (as a form of altruism) on happiness and health. These studies have consistently found a strong connection between volunteerism and a person’s well being and state of mind.

This means that when we give our time and our knowledge, we feel better and there is a good chance we are happier than if we didn’t volunteer. This will be my fifth Conference. I have been a volunteer since my first, both for Conference and the APP as a whole. These experiences have indeed made my life better! I was awarded the Al D. Scholarship in 2010 (we will talk more about Al D. further into this issue); it was here that I met an entire group of truly altruistic people. People that give freely of their time, their resources, and so much more to better the piercing industry as a whole. This once-ayear opportunity to give back is an amazing boost to my well being. It is a chance for me to recharge, so much so I now volunteer year round. However, it is incredibly important to point out that I am merely a single nut or cog, a tiny piece of a much bigger machine. There are just too many people to name that all work towards a common goal and the betterment of our entire industry. Without the hundreds of hours that are devoted each year the APP would only be a fraction of what it is today.

I count the days until our Conference begins and I am able to give back to a community that has given me so much. I can feel the anticipation building in not only myself but in my colleagues and I honestly feel the buzz this year is bigger than ever. So, I will take this moment before the chaos and craziness that is Conference sets in to say thank you! Thank you, to each and every one of the volunteers that help this organization, our Conference, and our industry.

Point #71: From the Editor – Jim Ward

Comments Off on Point #71: From the Editor – Jim Ward read From the Editor, Issue 71

Jim Ward headshotJim Ward
Managing Editor of Design & Layout

 

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that has.” —Margaret Mead

Thinking back to the early days of the APP, I have to marvel at how far the organization has come, but what is really amazing is that it made it into existence at all.

When Modern Primitives hit the bookstores in 1989, body modification, and particularly body piercing, hit the big time. Studios began popping up overnight like fungi after a spring rain. Few, if any, of the owners had any actual training or experience, and the competition was fierce. Rivalries were intense. There was little common ground.

The following is from my book Running the Gauntlet: “In 1994 the State of California was poised to pass legislation (Assembly Bill 3787) that would regulate body piercing, tattooing, and permanent cosmetics. A handful of piercers from several studios began to network and strategize how best to assure that these forms of body modification were not outlawed. Those who met at the Gauntlet corporate office for those early meetings included Raelyn Gallina, several representatives from Body Manipulations, Nomad, and Primeval Body in L.A. Along with some of his students, including Idexa, Fakir also attended. The office was full. As the pending legislation grew closer to passing, a group got together and drove to Sacramento. Michaela spoke on behalf of the industry during one of the hearings for the bill. She also did a number of television interviews. The bill ultimately failed thanks to lobbying by the ear-piercing gun manufacturers. However, this did not end the threats to the industry, and the need for a professional organization to deal with them.”

The APP was the organization that sprang from this need. A handful of rivals managed to set aside their differences and come together for their common good. Even though there are still differences, the APP has been able to grow and thrive. When a group of people work together for the common good, it’s amazing what they can accomplish. Happy 20th Anniversary!

Point #71: From the Editor – Marina Pecorino

Comments Off on Point #71: From the Editor – Marina Pecorino read From the Editor, Issue 71

Point-70-From-the-Editor-Marina-0.jpgMarina Pecorino
Managing Editor of Content & Statistics

 

My first experience at Conference was in 2012 as a love volunteer. I waited until my fourth year as a piercer to attend. I was intimidated by the amount of knowledge available and concerned that my foundation was not yet firm enough to grasp it all. What a mistake. Looking back, I wish I had attended Conference as soon and as often as possible. The experience really has changed my life in ways that I can’t explain, most of which are not ways that I would have expected.

Being an introvert, I’m not fully at ease in situations involving a multitude of strangers. This had also been a deterrent when thinking about attending. In an attempt to force myself out of my shell during that first year, I asked Caitlin McDiarmid if there was anything I could do to help. That’s where it all began.

As a love volunteer, I had fewer structured responsibilities, but there was still plenty to be done and we all worked together to make it happen. In the weeks leading up to Conference, I became Facebook friends with many of the other volunteers as we helped Caitlin prepare. Thanks to modern technology, I had a bit of exposure to all the friendly faces from across the world I would soon meet. I began to feel a bit more connected with the community. Previously, I stayed on the outskirts and isolated, having the expectation that I wasn’t “cool enough” to take part. It’s almost funny how, within a community comprised largely of shy, awkward, weirdos, I felt like I was too shy, awkward, and weird.

The accepting atmosphere exuded by everyone at Conference quickly changed my mind. Don’t get me wrong, I still barely spoke during that entire week and spent most of my meals alone, but I was a lot more at ease than I ever expected to be. Having the structure and encouragement of the 2012 volunteer group was an incredible experience, and without this experience, my life would be in a drastically different place right now.APP Conference Volunteers 2012

My original intention when I asked to volunteer was to distract myself from my insecurities. Unexpectedly, I also gained vital experience, life-long friends, and a closer connection to an extraordinary organization and community. I am inspired by the people that join forces to make the Association of Professional Piercers what it is. The level of dedication I have witnessed in my relatively short time of involvement is incredible. The sense of fulfillment from volunteering and taking part in such a project, as we all collaborate to spread the safe piercing message, has forever changed me.

This year will mark my second conference attendance (unfortunately, life interfered during 2013 and 2014) and my fourth year as a volunteer. For a while now, I’ve been counting down the days until Conference. I am in the process of mentally preparing myself to be more outgoing and not miss out on all the amazing hugs and support that are so plentiful during that one week. If our paths cross, please don’t hesitate to say hello, especially if you’re a first year attendee! I also encourage new attendees to take full advantage of the mentor program, especially if you’re shy, awkward, and weird. This program is a great way to feel less alone and overwhelmed during a week filled with so many new faces, lessons, and experiences. And I hear that if you’re in search of the best chicken and waffles around, these amazing people can point you in the right direction.

Point #70: From The Editor – Jim

Comments Off on Point #70: From The Editor – Jim read Editorial, From the Editor, Issue 70

Jim Ward headshotJim Ward
Managing Editor of Design & Layout

As many of you know, Kim Zapata the previous Editor of The Point has stepped down to devote more time to other aspects of her life. We owe her an enormous debt of gratitude for her work and will miss her. She did an outstanding job and has left big shoes to fill. Perhaps that is why the APP Board has asked three of us to take over her duties. I will be sharing responsibilities with my co-editors Kendra Jane Berndt and Marina Pecorino.

The Point has been a part of APP history since its beginning in 1994–5, and I am thrilled and privileged to have been involved, on and off, for many years. The organization came into being through the tireless efforts of my Gauntlet associate, Michaela Grey, and a handful of other body mod professionals. As the pressures of government intervention reared its ugly head, these practitioners were committed to seeing that our industry would survive. The content of Issue #1 contains a great deal borrowed from Gauntlet’s piercing seminar manual.

In 1998 Gauntlet went out of business. Thankfully, by that time the APP had already become an independent entity. With Gauntlet’s demise, I withdrew into a shell. In 2003, with Issue #25, the APP reached out to me and asked me to take on the design and layout of The Point and to submit an article about Doug Malloy, who had inspired me to open Gauntlet in the first place. I continued in the designer position until 2005 when the Board decided to expand the newsletter and print it in color at which time the torch was passed to another Art Director. The printed color issues, #33 through #60, took The Point to a whole new level and brought it to a peak of professionalism worthy of the organization. I remained on the sidelines through much of this period, occasionally being asked to present at the annual Conference.

For Issue #41 (2007), then president James Weber asked my permission to reproduce the cover of an old issue of Gauntlet’s publication Piercing Fans International Quarterly (PFIQ) showing the penis piercings of Louis Rove, the gay, adoptive father of right-wing extremist Karl Rove. The only change he made was to alter the masthead to say “The Point” in the same font as the original magazine. This and every issue of The Point can be viewed and/or downloaded from the APP website, http://www.safepiercing.org/publications/the-point/back-issues/.

Like all organizations, the APP has experienced its own financial ups and downs. In 2012 in an effort to economize, as well as to keep up with current trends, departing from its print publication. The Board made the decision to produce The Point in digital format only. I was approached about taking over once again as Art Director for the newsletter and gladly accepted. My first was Issue #61 and here is issue #70. I thoroughly love doing this job for an organization I deeply admire and respect, and I hope to continue to do so for many years to come.

This is a landmark year in the world of body modification Gauntlet, the world’s first body piercing studio will turn 40 and the APP will celebrate its 20th anniversary. This issue and the next of The Point will kick off the celebration, with a dedication to this special occasion and to our annual Conference in June. We encourage every reader to make the effort to attend what is sure to be a memorable event.

Point #70: From the Editor – Kendra

Comments Off on Point #70: From the Editor – Kendra read Editorial, From the Editor, Issue 70
Kendra Jane headshot

Kendra Jane Berndt

“We can not know where are going if we do not know from where we come.”

-unknown

It is an incredible honor to be saying “Hello” and officially introducing myself as one of new editorial team for The Point. I have had the pleasure of being a contributing editor and author for The Point over the past 3 years. Some of you may know me, however most of you probably won’t. In the grand scheme of things I am definitely a new kid on the block. This month I celebrate 5 years of piercing, and I come by this industry a different path than most. I bring with me a bachelor’s degree in both science and education, with much of my past experience focusing on education in one manner or another. I had the distinguished pleasure of being chosen an Al D Scholar in 2010, and now sit on the Al D Selection Committee. I have also since been a research assistant for Paul King, and join him on the Body Piercing Archive Committee, as well as am a Super Volunteer at Conference. You will once again find me behind the registration desk this year. Come say hi! I am greatly looking forward to working with our new team, Marina and Jim, to bring you the industry’s only dedicated trade journal.

In this, our first issue as a new team, we want to take you on a journey over the past two decades, as we get ready to celebrate the Association of Professional Piercers’ 20th anniversary this June in Las Vegas. It is amazing to see what this industry has grown from and I personally can not wait to see what the future holds for both the APP and the body piercing industry as a whole.

Point #70: From the Editor – Marina

Comments Off on Point #70: From the Editor – Marina read Editorial, From the Editor, Issue 70
Marina Pecorino headshot

Marina Pecorino
Managing Editor of Content & Statistics

Several years into my professional piercing career, I served as a Love Volunteer for the APP Conference & Exposition 2012. I can honestly say that my life is forever changed as a result.

Despite a diverse career history and my current work in an unrelated field, the piercing industry continues to be a major passion in my life, much like it is for most of you. I am elated (and a bit nervous) to tackle this challenge and break out of my shell as part of the newest editorial team for this historic publication. I am even more thrilled to be given this opportunity during such a monumental anniversary.

In planning for this transitional issue, many new ideas have begun to hatch. Not all of these ideas will come to fruition, but our team has a shared goal to broaden The Point with an influx of new information and energy. We also realize the importance of honoring the history and upholding the continued mission within these pages. Current technology and the accessibility of information makes this an incredibly exciting time for the safe piercing message. Please join us in the dissemination of this message by sharing The Point with your colleagues, clients, and friends.

With great enthusiasm,

Marina Pecorino

Point #69: From the Editor

Comments Off on Point #69: From the Editor read Editorial, From the Editor

Kim Zapata headshot_2014By Kimberly Zapata

It is with a mix of emotions that I write this From the Editor column, as it will be my last. After months of struggling to maintain that precious life/work balance we all seek, I found it to be too great after some very personal, and unexpected, circumstances arose. Something had to give; unfortunately, that something proved to be this publication.

I began my work with The Point in late 2009, just after I started working at Infinite Body Piercing, Inc. I sat down to edit articles for issue #49, my first, and felt totally and completely intimidated. I felt secure in my knowledge of language and grammar rules, but the content was mostly foreign. (I was modified, yes, and loved body modification but I had no industry experience. I was an outsider looking in.) I edited those articles as timidly as one could have, changing punctuation and fixing spelling mistakes. And edited in this manner for many issues, until James Weber encouraged me to be more aggressive — reminding me it was our publication and our industry, reminding me I was a part of that industry. I still felt an outsider as I wasn’t, and would never be, a piercer, but my confidence grew.

I continued serving  as a contributing editor for several years. but when James stepped down in 2012—and The Point switched from a print publication to an online one—I took the reigns, with issue #61.

The entire time I have worked with the APP and this publication,  as both editor and a contributing editor, has been nothing short of amazing. I hope to continue on as part of the “Point posse,” I just no longer have the time to dedicate to spearheading the publication that it (and you all) deserve.

What’s next for The Point? Whatever you want! That is the beauty of this publication, and our organization. The Point will become whatever you want it to, whatever you make of it. While it is with a touch of sadness that I must do this, I also know it will be exciting for The Point to get some “fresh blood” in, and take the publication to another level.

I want to thank my amazing Point team: Kendra Jane, Elayne Angel, and Jim Ward. It has been an honor and pleasure working with each of you. Even with all of the initial (and technical) hiccups, you made my transition smooth and seamless. You always made me feel part of a family I, for so long, convinced myself I wasn’t worthy of, and you have each touched my life, and my work, in a way I can never truly verbalize. I am eternally grateful for everything the three of you have given me.

And to James Weber, my predecessor and current boss: Thanks for seeing something special in the little girl with the overly wordy resume and “anime” hair. You took a chance on me and, looking back I cannot say I know why, but that chance has forever changed me, personally and professionally. I am blessed and honored to not only call you my boss but my friend.

I want to thank the Board, old and new, and the entire APP family: Thank you all for allowing me to be a part of this incredible organization and for trusting me with such an integral role. It has been a wonderful ride.